Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RFEngineer

No lies. You only wish they were lies, because soft-tissue finds in supposedly multi-million year old fossils are becoming a common occurance, and they directly contradict the evo-assumption of deep time. Nice try though.


59 posted on 12/11/2009 9:41:25 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: GodGunsGuts

It quite clearly states in the paper that the material was fossilized. The reason it’s making news is because soft tissue rarely fossilizes compared to bone, teeth etc.

There was no orginal flesh, just fossilized soft tissue.


63 posted on 12/11/2009 9:44:32 AM PST by Natufian (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

“No lies.”

Complete lies. Trace the post to ICR then to it’s source. You are lying about this find. You know it.

“because soft-tissue finds in supposedly multi-million year old fossils are becoming a common occurance,”

It has never happened. I’d admit it if it did happen, I don’t have an agenda like you do. I don’t have a FR fan base to keep happy.

The only “fresh meat” in this post are the lies you’ve thrown to your fawning fans of “creation science”. They are misguided - you are just a common fool and liar.


64 posted on 12/11/2009 9:45:58 AM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson