No lies. You only wish they were lies, because soft-tissue finds in supposedly multi-million year old fossils are becoming a common occurance, and they directly contradict the evo-assumption of deep time. Nice try though.
It quite clearly states in the paper that the material was fossilized. The reason it’s making news is because soft tissue rarely fossilizes compared to bone, teeth etc.
There was no orginal flesh, just fossilized soft tissue.
“No lies.”
Complete lies. Trace the post to ICR then to it’s source. You are lying about this find. You know it.
“because soft-tissue finds in supposedly multi-million year old fossils are becoming a common occurance,”
It has never happened. I’d admit it if it did happen, I don’t have an agenda like you do. I don’t have a FR fan base to keep happy.
The only “fresh meat” in this post are the lies you’ve thrown to your fawning fans of “creation science”. They are misguided - you are just a common fool and liar.