From your link:
[14] We note the fact that the Court in Wong Kim Ark did not actually pronounce the plaintiff a natural born Citizen using the Constitution‟s Article II language is immaterial.
The judge gets it right in this aspect that Ark was not a natural born citizen but draws the incorrect conclusion. Every case from about 1850 to 1952 which had mentioned case subjects with foreign parent(s) and were born in the United States, were called 'native born' and none were called natural born citizens. Except, in the case of 1939, Perkins v. Elg, were Miss Elg was correctly called a Natural Born Citizen. The US Supreme Court have consistently differentiated 'native born' versus 'natural born' were this judge Dreyer has conflated them to be the same.
For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the trial court‟s grant of the Governor‟s motion to dismiss. Affirmed.
The case never made it to trail thus avoiding uncertainty in the issue where the judge would have less control.
trail = trial
The two other Indiana Appeals Court justices who heard the Ankeny case on appeal concurred with the judge who wrote the opinion.
Thus far plaintiffs have won no judgements challenging Obama’s eligibility at the state, state appeals, state Supreme Courts, federal, federal appeals or US Supreme Court. Judgements have gone in Obama’s favor in 66 lawsuits.
The way to resolve this issue is to get the Republican Attorney General of Hawaii, Mark Bennett to subpoena Obama’s vault copy, long form birth certificate and convene a Grand Jury with expert testimony to see if the original document and the short form COLB that Obama posted on the internet are identical and valid.
The case never made it to trail thus avoiding uncertainty in the issue where the judge would have less control.