Skip to comments.
Buchanan: ...- No Proof of Manmade Global Warming; Clift: 'No Known Proof There's God Either'
Newbusters ^
| 11/29/09
| Jeff Poor
Posted on 12/10/2009 9:56:31 AM PST by Reaganesque
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Interesting comment. Is she saying that AGW is her God? Or perhaps her Liberalism is her God? Either way, this is more evidence that AGW is not science but a religious movement and that Liberals will scream "heresy" when their God is questioned. So much for their devotion to the seperation of church and state.
To: Reaganesque; Entrepreneur; livius; DollyCali; According2RecentPollsAirIsGood; Thunder90; ...
2
posted on
12/10/2009 9:58:07 AM PST
by
steelyourfaith
(Time to prosecute Al Gore now that fellow scam artist Bernie Madoff is in stir.)
To: Reaganesque
I would say to her that belief in a God that can’t be proven does not cost a dime, affects nobody but myself, and requires no federal intervention.
3
posted on
12/10/2009 9:58:13 AM PST
by
Not A Snowbird
(Socialism is the plundering of the productive by the unaccountable)
To: Reaganesque
If there was no God, that fool wouldn’t be breathing.
4
posted on
12/10/2009 9:58:18 AM PST
by
rbosque
(11 year Freeper! Can't get rid of me Jim! Well, you can but you've put up with me so far.)
To: Reaganesque
Has anyone ever taken Eleanor Clift seriously?
To: Reaganesque
Oh what I wouldnt give to be a fly on the Pearly Gates when this beach goes
To: Reaganesque
We always knew what the libs were;and now they’re proving us right more and more every day.
7
posted on
12/10/2009 9:59:21 AM PST
by
massmike
(...So this is what happens when OJ's jury elects the president....)
To: Reaganesque
She said she believes U.S. policy should be proactive toward the issue.Well that is great. How about this:
Just in case there is a God that will judge us, lets stop abortions. Lets be proactive just in case.
8
posted on
12/10/2009 9:59:36 AM PST
by
Raycpa
To: Reaganesque
Clift appears to be admitting that Global Warming is based on faith rather than science. That Christianity is based primarily on faith was already understood (by Christians and non-Christians). GW has been sold as science — so this admission is rather groundbreaking.
SnakeDoc
9
posted on
12/10/2009 10:00:21 AM PST
by
SnakeDoctor
("Talk low, talk slow, and don't say too much." -- John Wayne)
To: Reaganesque
I want to see the e-mails that give evidence that the existence of God is a scam.
10
posted on
12/10/2009 10:00:47 AM PST
by
fhayek
To: Reaganesque
Poor Eleanor. She is such a schlub.
11
posted on
12/10/2009 10:01:25 AM PST
by
RexBeach
("Those are my principles...if you don't like them, I have others." Groucho Marx)
To: Reaganesque
Geez...are the editors on strike over there, or what? The piece is so poorly written it distracts from the points the author attempts to make...I’m not sure what she is saying...but, I suspect, neither does she...
12
posted on
12/10/2009 10:02:39 AM PST
by
jessduntno
(Stop The Federal Usurpation.)
To: massmike
I think she gets around on a broom.
13
posted on
12/10/2009 10:02:52 AM PST
by
SMARTY
("What luck for rulers that men do not think. " Adolph Hitler)
To: Reaganesque
A typical non sequitur response when debating a liberal that cannot produce facts.
14
posted on
12/10/2009 10:03:25 AM PST
by
Pox
To: Reaganesque
Clift confirms it. AGW is a religion. A rather sick religion too since we human beings are all scummy pollutants to them since we exhale CO2.
15
posted on
12/10/2009 10:04:40 AM PST
by
Stepan12
(Palin & Bolton in 2012)
To: SMARTY
Let’s compare the e-mails from East Anglia to The Gospels!
16
posted on
12/10/2009 10:06:09 AM PST
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: Reaganesque
A dead soul like Clift merely confirms that AGW is a religion to the dead soul liberals. No proof is needed with their faith-based mindless sycophancy to liberalism.
17
posted on
12/10/2009 10:07:01 AM PST
by
MHGinTN
(Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
To: Pox
Yup, classic liberal debate technique, dingbatesque.....as in Edith Bunker.
To: SnakeDoctor
That Christianity is based primarily on faith was already understoodExcept the evidence of the historicity of Christ and his resurrection in the form of eyewitness testimony quickly reduced to writing and widely reproduced and shared far and wide exceeds the raw evidence provided by the scientists to support global warming.
Further, unlike the evidence for Christ which has not been falsified, what little evidence that has been disclosed by the scientists was immediately shown to be a hoax and to be false.
19
posted on
12/10/2009 10:07:27 AM PST
by
Raycpa
To: Reaganesque
I’m sure that Clift would defend the idea of separation of church and state. Thus, she should also support the separation of AGW and state.
20
posted on
12/10/2009 10:08:09 AM PST
by
oblomov
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson