[Raycpa]

That Christianity is based primarily on faith was already understood

Except the evidence of the historicity of Christ and his resurrection in the form of eyewitness testimony quickly reduced to writing and widely reproduced and shared far and wide exceeds the raw evidence provided by the scientists to support global warming.

Further, unlike the evidence for Christ which has not been falsified, what little evidence that has been disclosed by the scientists was immediately shown to be a hoax and to be false.

[SnakeDoctor]

Notice I said “primarily”, not entirely. I am fully aware of the historical evidence.

SnakeDoc

[katlynne11]

Yes. And for those who want to consider it further, given that all of science and Christianity agree that the universe had a beginning, the question needs to asked of Ms.Clift....”If there is no God, why is there anyting at all?” Why would all of this time-space, matter, energy continuum exist or come to exist from nothing?

[MHGinTN]

Perhaps Snake Doctor meant to refer to the awakening of the human spirit, which is a function of God's Spirit, and the response is then faith-based.

There is more eyewitness testimony to the actual life, death, AND resurrection of Jesus than a court would need to convict, but --as any saved sinner will know-- accepting His delivering me from my sin-determined destiny is pure faith-based. Perhaps Snake Doctor has not yet gotten beyond the milk stage ...