That statement has greater depth than anything else I have ever read on a crevo thread. A tip of the hat to you.
That you still hold that opinion after the number of times Brian has been shown to be ignorant, deceitful, and/or just plain wrong speaks volumes about your standards for science writing. I for one don't hate him, I admire his ability as a propagandist and envy him his job. Maybe I'm just not average enough to fully appreciate him--maybe I just need to know less.
That statement has greater depth than anything else I have ever read on a crevo thread. A tip of the hat to you.
My standards are obviously far above yours, otherwise I would be posting about how nature selects from random processes to create complex, specified, super-sophisticated digital DNA codes, while I ignored the fact that the only empirically verified source for complex, specified, digital codes are intelligent designers.
“maybe I just need to know less. “
Naw, it can’t be this.