Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem

Edison’s vision for electricity was similar. In his conception every block would have it’s own private electric generator providing power for a dozen or so homes. Economies of scale dictate, nevertheless, that you save a lot of money by building one gigantic power plant rather than by building a thousand small ones.


3 posted on 12/09/2009 7:49:00 PM PST by eclecticEel (The Most High rules in the kingdom of men ... and sets over it the basest of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: eclecticEel
Economies of scale dictate, nevertheless, that you save a lot of money by building one gigantic power plant rather than by building a thousand small ones.

That's true as long as the efficiency at the one gigantic power plant is higher than thousands of smaller generators.

But, transmission line losses reduce that efficiency. If you can achieve better efficiencies locally and can use the excess heat for something else (like hot water or heating), it starts to become viable.

There's also the maintenance issue: a mechanically driven generator is beyond the ability of many people to keep running properly, not to mention the noise. A silent, low-maintenance fuel-cell generator would be more practical.

In the end, it will depend on how much it cost to "feed" the generator, and whether the effective cost per kilowatt hour is less than getting your electricity from the grid. The difference (and your usage) will determine how long it takes to recoup the cost of the generator.

4 posted on 12/09/2009 7:57:56 PM PST by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson