This event was seen by several thousands of normal people with no agenda, and lots of photographs of it. The event is not in doubt. The reasons for it may be at the moment, but someone explained earlier on another thread how it looked like a spiraling (failed) missle launch. Seems the Russian’s statement of a failed launch agrees with that explanation.
Anthropogneic global warming on the other hand is primarily observed by folks with a financial (grants, taxes, carbon offsets, etc.) or a political (bring America to its knees) agenda. It can not be photographed, but it can be “modelled”. And data, once properly “adjusted” can show warming.
Oh. I didn't realize that the science was settled. /s
I'm willing to be proven wrong but it's going to take more than the reports I've seen here.
BTW: George Noory hosts a radio show you may be interested in. There are millions of people who have seen similar things and they call in all the time to testify.
