It is possible it is an unknown cycle, but it isn’t tied to the sun spot cycle itself.
I didn't miss that. I did get it, but I'm saying that what we've seen that has affected the climate in the past has always been an up-and-down thing or a cycle of some kind. So, no matter whether we know about it now, knew about it in the past, or will know about it in the future -- the fact of the matter is that there have been countless unending cycles...
You have to have a field strength of 1500 to have sun spots, below that it can’t form.
Well, even if we were to accept that as true, it doesn't mean there isn't a cycle there either and that we would end up "cycling right out of it" once again.
But, I really don't know that this assertion is even true, even if someone (or several) think it's true.
This is new. It could indicate a new ice age is starting.
Well, that prospect was a possibility even before this was known. I don't know if this particular item has anything to do with it, though...
Ok, you get it then we can be at solar max without any sun spots then?