Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Taliban's Shadowy Partners
Investors.com ^ | December 8, 2009 | INVESTORS BUSINESS DAILY staff

Posted on 12/08/2009 6:01:55 PM PST by Kaslin

War On Terror: The anti-war crowd says the small number of enemy fighters inside Afghanistan doesn't justify sending 30,000 fresh troops there. They fail to understand the larger problem.

Sen. Barbara Boxer complains al-Qaida is scarcely in Afghanistan. She cites an intelligence report leaked to ABC News that only 100 fighters are actually present inside the country, along with several thousand Taliban fighters.

"I do not support adding more troops," the California Democrat argued, "because there are now 200,000 American, NATO and Afghan forces fighting roughly 20,000 Taliban and less than 100 al-Qaida."

In other words, why are we even over there?

What Boxer and other war critics fail to understand is there's almost an endless supply of enemy fighters streaming across the border from neighboring Pakistan, where they're actually based.

In fact, it's an open secret the Taliban are headquartered across the border in the city of Quetta, Pakistan, where they operate openly under the aegis of Pakistani intelligence — and the financial sponsorship of the Saudis.

Sending more troops to Afghanistan is a necessary, albeit unfortunate, rear-guard action against marauding Taliban fighters armed, trained, supplied and deployed from Quetta — and funded from Riyadh.

NATO and U.S. military command know this. They've complained about it over and over in military action reports. So have Treasury officials regarding Saudi funding of the Taliban.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afganistan; afpak; alqaida; barbaraboxer; boxer; cluelessindc; democrat; democrats; globaljihad; isi; islamabad; jihad; pakistan; pakistanintelligence; saudiarabia; singh; southasia; taleban; taliban; waronterror

1 posted on 12/08/2009 6:01:55 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: alrea; bareford101; BerniesFriend; blaveda; Bookwoman; Celeste732; dsc; fanfan; Faux_Pas; ...

2 posted on 12/08/2009 6:02:59 PM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for 0bama: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Taliban’s Shadowy Partners ... Washington Democrats!


3 posted on 12/08/2009 6:10:34 PM PST by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas

literally


4 posted on 12/08/2009 6:13:37 PM PST by RepublicanMeansAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The biggest problem is the ISI. They fully equip and fund the Taliban with our tax payer money.


5 posted on 12/08/2009 6:17:55 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("We will either find a way, or make one."Hannibal/Carthaginian Military Commander)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Not including the other things they do such as drug running and weapons proliferation.


6 posted on 12/08/2009 6:18:45 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("We will either find a way, or make one."Hannibal/Carthaginian Military Commander)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Sen. Barbara Boxer complains al-Qaida is scarcely in Afghanistan. She cites an intelligence report ... that only 100 fighters are actually present inside the country, along with several thousand Taliban fighters.

This is the same witch that pilloried Bush for his utter failure in Afghanistan because enemy insurgents were running wild in Helmland and the Hindu Kush.

7 posted on 12/08/2009 6:23:14 PM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

why are we there?

nuclear weapons


8 posted on 12/08/2009 6:27:59 PM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
This is the same witch that pilloried Bush for his utter failure in Afghanistan because enemy insurgents were running wild in Helmland and the Hindu Kush.

And the same witch who has no problem with leaks about the NSA intercepting enemy communications and leaks about the number of Al Qaeda in Afghanistan, but is hysterical over leaks about global warming lies.

9 posted on 12/08/2009 6:29:47 PM PST by Dahoser (The missus and I joined the NRA. Who says Obama can't inspire conservatives?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

Which is already a lost cause. Many of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons are in the Punjab which is a haven for the Taliban.


10 posted on 12/08/2009 6:32:14 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("We will either find a way, or make one."Hannibal/Carthaginian Military Commander)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson