Skip to comments.
Democrats split over use of ‘party of no’
The Hill ^
| 12/8/2009
| Ian Swanson
Posted on 12/08/2009 8:32:24 AM PST by markomalley
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: markomalley
The economic stimulus bill is not working... no matter who voted for or against it....
2
posted on
12/08/2009 8:34:30 AM PST
by
JoanneSD
To: markomalley
“Just say NO!”
I like it.
To: markomalley
Begala is correct this one time - he’s still a putz - but he is right.
4
posted on
12/08/2009 8:34:50 AM PST
by
hometoroost
(Obama clubs Navy SEALsB)
To: markomalley
Just keep taking polls until you get the response you want. I say canvas Berkley.
5
posted on
12/08/2009 8:35:33 AM PST
by
subterfuge
(BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
To: markomalley
I am a proud member of the party of NO!!!
6
posted on
12/08/2009 8:36:07 AM PST
by
kitkat
To: markomalley
Label them because “No” is so evil....Keep it up you commies you’re simply destroying yourself with every prideful, greedy, stupid decision you make!
To: kitkat
I wish the Republicans were the party of no. They are actually the party of not quite so much.
To: markomalley
The party of “NO SOCIALISM” -there. problem solved.
To: markomalley
We certainly should say "no" to socialism and Big Government Health Care. There is nothing wrong with the word "no." It not used nearly enough. Never give in on principle. I intend to stay where I am for the rest of my life in respect to my beliefs.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find only things evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelogus
10
posted on
12/08/2009 8:38:57 AM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: markomalley
As opposed to the Socialist-Democrat Party of “Da, comrade!”
11
posted on
12/08/2009 8:42:22 AM PST
by
a fool in paradise
(Question authority!Who is the University of East Anglia to drive the 'Global Climate Change' agenda?)
To: markomalley
But Dissent is Patriotic...
Stalinist Revisionist History means never having to defend hypocrisy.
12
posted on
12/08/2009 8:44:35 AM PST
by
a fool in paradise
(Question authority!Who is the University of East Anglia to drive the 'Global Climate Change' agenda?)
To: markomalley
You mean, the Dems vote on these things? - what latest new name or catch-phrase they're going to call us?
And the Republicans - what do they do? Any talking points from them? Any strategies to knock the Dems down a peg? No, I didn't think so.
To: markomalley
More bailouts. More taxes. More federal government.
I belong to the party of “HELL NO!”.
14
posted on
12/08/2009 8:50:37 AM PST
by
swain_forkbeard
(Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
To: markomalley
Say - why don’t label the Dem Party for what it really is: the Party of Murder, Treason and Socialism. Stick it in their faces and up their rear ends.
15
posted on
12/08/2009 8:55:04 AM PST
by
Noumenon
(Work that AQT - turn ammunition into skill. No tyrant can maintain a 300 yard perimeter forever.)
To: swain_forkbeard
Exactly! Not just “NO” but “HELL NO”.
The end of free markets and capitalism to become a completely socialist country.....HELL NO!
our Foreign policy in regard to Natl Security being one of submission....HELL NO!
Giving up our 2nd amendment right to defend ourselves and family....HELL NO!
Proud member of the “HELL NO” club!!!!!
To: all the best
the party of “a little less”
17
posted on
12/08/2009 9:01:53 AM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America.)
To: Patriot4ever
I think it’s a great campaign slogan and could really catch on.
To: Noumenon
You left “Slavery” off your list; they’ve been pushing that for two centuries.
19
posted on
12/08/2009 9:04:15 AM PST
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: markomalley
He (Begala) says Republicans are the party of “colossal deficits and tax cuts for the wealthy,” not the party of no. Mega-4-Head Begala is going to have to find a much bigger word than colossal to describe obama's deficits and his tax increases on everyone.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson