Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GodGunsGuts; metmom

>>Good point, Metmom. Indeed, given the nature of the scientific method, one wonders why anyone would both to redicule past scientific beliefs as, at least in most cases, said scientific beliefs reflected the state of the art science at that time.<<

Well, the state of science today and in the foreseeable future does not include deities.


51 posted on 12/07/2009 8:15:08 PM PST by freedumb2003 (Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks. Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: freedumb2003

freedumb2003 is right. If you must “believe” it ain’t science. Science must be testable to prove a hypothesis. Religion ased people to put a belief statement into the experimental process. That’s not science.

And don’t’ start namecalling. I’m a fundamental evangelical.


62 posted on 12/07/2009 8:31:30 PM PST by morkfork (Candygram for Mongo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson