Posted on 12/06/2009 7:28:47 AM PST by yoe
An interview of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio conducted by reporters from the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism at Arizona State University in Phoenix Monday night ended prematurely due to disruptive protests.
Arpaio, has faced criticism among the media and charges of racial profiling during his illegal immigration sweeps.
Arpaio was chosen by ASU because he is “powerful, popular and controversial” said Cronkite dean Christopher Callahan, who pointed out that interrupting the protests eliminated the effectiveness of the three journalists’ questions.
“The scenario is you don’t want public scrutiny of this man,” Callahan told the protestors. “You don’t want reporters to be asking him tough questions.”
Questions asked ranged on topics from the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office’s lack of response to public information requests to Arpaio’s personal relationship with the media.
“I’m the elected sheriff. I have to [communicate] to the people I represent,” Arpaio said. “I don’t have to have a public information officer follow me around. I have an open door policy for the media.”
The panel of journalists, Cronkite professors Rick Rodriguez, Susan Green and Steve Elliott, cited instances in which reporters were allegedly turned away from press conferences by the sheriff’s office.
“Most of the time I deal with the media is controversial,” he responded. “I’m not afraid to face the media no matter what the subject is.”
Arpaio elaborated that when a press conference is called, “it’s for a specific subject. If there are a couple instances where one or two reporters come in to get me or respond to other issues, they can do that in private,” he said.
The panelists also discussed several lawsuits in which the Arpaio’s office targeted members of the media for reporting unfavorably on the sheriff, including an instance where the MCSO allegedly refused to send press releases to a west valley newspaper.
In response, Arpaio said the MCSO began publishing its press releases online where anyone could access them.
As a result, “we did improve our relationship with that newspaper,” he said.
The panelists also addressed the arrest of two Phoenix New Times reporters who were arrested for allegedly reporting grand jury information.
“I presume that is a violation of the law. The issue is that my chief deputy made a decision to put those two people under arrest,” he said. “There is a logical reason for everything we’ve done in that investigation.”
Arpaio refused to elaborate or answer questions directly on either the New Times or West Valley View cases, citing pending litigation.
The panel also addressed the MCSO’s responsiveness to public records requests and accusations of stalling reporters and unnecessarily redacting information for which it has no legal right.
The Sheriff wondered aloud whether media purposely filed “thousands and thousands” of reports with the intention of complaining when each request wasn’t handled in a timely manner.
“When you ask for tons of information… That takes time. It all depends on the circumstance in the situation… There has to be a little line [to wait in],” he said. “We’re going to try to get to it as quickly as we can,” he said.
The event was brought to a close 10 minutes early after the panelists posed a question of whether the Sheriff viewed himself above the law, in light of his recent public refusal to cooperate in the federal investigation into allegations that the MCSO racially profiles during its illegal immigration raids.
Before the Sheriff could fully respond, a group of protestors in the mostly-student crowd sung a parody of Queen’s “Bohemian Rhapsody,” denouncing the sheriff’s tactics.
Peoria Resident ASU Journalism junior Chris Ogino summed the disruption up as “interesting.”
He said he wasn’t sure if the group got their point across.
“I think it reflects badly overall,” he said. “I don’t think that’s really their point, but I don’t care.”
Green said after the event that she thinks things still went well, in spite of the protestors. She said the point was to show the school’s journalists how to ask questions in different ways to get responses out of tougher interview subjects.
“The point of this was to teach the students how to ask tough questions,” she said. “If you don’t get the answer that you want, just keep asking it.”
Green said the problem wasn’t the protestors, but the fact that they forced an end to a discussion that included difficult questions aimed at the sheriff.
“I don’t have a problem with people protesting,” she said. “We had 12 minutes of great questions that we didn’t get to ask. What I wish is that they would have waited until the end.”
H/T
Jake Harris is a student at ASU. Jake attended Monday Night’s debacle and contributed this article to SWR.
"The Sheriff wondered aloud whether media purposely filed “thousands and thousands” of reports with the intention of complaining when each request wasn’t handled in a timely manner." - that is a tactic used against Sarah Palin.
How can you "racially profile during illegal immigration raids of Mexicans?
How about this:
Jake Harris is a student learning the WEASEL METHOD of journalism at an early age. Quote and/or refer to anonymous 'critics' when the 'critic' is actually the writer of the piece. Include buzzwords that support your position but omit any opposing view especially statistics such as a drop in the crime rate that might tend to support the other side.
I used to live in Maricopa County, AZ. I love Sheriff Joe!
...of course he should profile...if you’re cracking down on illegals from Mexico, you look for Mexicans.
Typical leftist "journalism".
Cronkite school of Journalism: If you don’t get the answer you want, just lie.
Interesting and informative article. Am wondering which portion of the song the protestors sang.
Joe was assaulted by a racist lynch mob, plain and simple.
If the sweeps are actually illegal...what the hell difference does it make if there is any racial profiling going on or not?
More typical critical thinking by alleged journalists.
Anyonw who says that law enforcement doesn’t profile is a liar. You have to profile to be an effective law enforcement officer.
Katie Couric is the guest lecturer on this topic..."Some people say....."
RACIAL PROFILING IS *GOOD*
If a woman gets carjacked and says it was a young black men do you want police driving around looking for
1) grannies in wheelchairs?
2) White professional business men
3) teenage chearleaders?
4) young black men
5) mexicans
If you answered 4 then THAT’S RACIAL PROFILING AND IT IS GOOD POLICE WORK
“Walter Cronkite School of Journalism” talk about heads full of mush.
A questions these “journalists” failed to ask Sheriff Joe was “Have these sweeps resulted in any reduction in crime?” The answer is YES by about 29%, but they’re not Interested in factual investigative reporting!
To pay tuition to get a degree in a dying vocation does indeed prove the presence of skulls full of mush.
If the journalists would quit caring about who is going to be the next media star and start caring about the truth.
The need to quit manufacturing junk.
Antiabortion Extremism
A movement of groups or individuals who are virulently antiabortion and advocate violence against providers of abortion-related services, their employees, and their facilities. Some cite various racist and anti-Semitic beliefs to justify their criminal activities.
Anti-immigration Extremism
A movement of groups or individuals who are vehemently opposed to illegal immigration, particularly along the U.S. southwest border with Mexico, and who have been known to advocate or engage in criminal activity and plot acts of violence and terrorism to advance their extremist goals. They are highly critical of the U.S. Government’s response to illegal immigration and oppose government programs that are designed to extend “rights” to illegal aliens, such as issuing driver’s licenses or national identification cards and providing in-state tuition, medical benefits, or public education.
Jewish Extremism
A movement of groups or individuals of the Jewish faith who are willing to use violence or commit other criminal acts to protect themselves against perceived affronts to their religious or ethnic identity.
Patriot Movement
A term used by rightwing extremists to link their beliefs to those commonly associated with the American Revolution. The patriot movement primarily comprises violent antigovernment groups such as militias and sovereign citizens.
(also: Christian patriots, patriot group, Constitutionalists, Constitutionist)
Rightwing Extremism
A movement of rightwing groups or individuals who can be broadly divided into those who are primarily hate-oriented, and those who are mainly antigovernment and reject federal authority in favor of state or local authority. This term also may refer to rightwing extremist movements
that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.
(also known as far right, extreme right)
Yes. All logical, intelligent, effective people profile......PC efforts are to destroy Western Civilization and create chaos. The PCers are handcuffing and blindfolding all our law enforcement people and it needs to end now!
Your wrong with this statement. Where searching for illegal immigrants, you should look for Amish or red headed freckled Irishmen. (I am freckled Irish but not red headed)but don't look for Mexicans or those of middle eastern persuasion..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.