Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Old Retired Army Guy

The SEALs chose Courts Martial rather than a mast, did they not?


18 posted on 12/05/2009 8:33:57 AM PST by Ready4Freddy (Everyone knows there's a difference between muslims & terrorists... no one knows what it is, though.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Ready4Freddy

That’s correct, but if my somewhat unreliable military justice memory serves me, I believe they still are required to convene an Article 32 hearing to determine weather or not to go forward with a Courts Martial.


20 posted on 12/05/2009 8:36:30 AM PST by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Ready4Freddy

At least some are aware they are SEALS not seals.


40 posted on 12/05/2009 8:59:18 AM PST by Recon Dad ( SSgt O - 3rd Afghanistan Deployment - Day 46)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Ready4Freddy

Your point is? They also said that they did not harm him.
I believe them. You believe who you choose. If they had chosen Captain’s Mast, they would have to admit to doing things they did not do. They are being railroaded.


68 posted on 12/05/2009 10:18:39 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson