To: bruinbirdman
All the raw data, the analysis of that data and the conclusions need to be publicly available on their Web site for anyone to analyze that wants to.
That is the only way to have confidence in the results. It is as simple as that.
2 posted on
12/04/2009 11:43:44 PM PST by
DB
To: bruinbirdman
Heh...Might be tougher than they think since the original data was lost (or intentionally destroyed)...
I’m sure their investigation will therefore conclude that the results are correct (assuming that those investigating are looking for grants themselves (probably) - heh)...
3 posted on
12/04/2009 11:43:45 PM PST by
Deagle
To: bruinbirdman
However, it says it wants to create a new and fully open method of analysing temperature data.
Ahh... the scientific approach, at long last...
4 posted on
12/04/2009 11:43:58 PM PST by
az_gila
(AZ - need less democrats - one Governor down... more to go.)
To: bruinbirdman
5 posted on
12/04/2009 11:44:09 PM PST by
jeffc
(They're coming to take me away! Ha-ha, hey-hey, ho-ho!)
To: bruinbirdman; Defendingliberty; WL-law; Normandy; TenthAmendmentChampion; FrPR; enough_idiocy; ...
6 posted on
12/04/2009 11:49:06 PM PST by
steelyourfaith
(Time to prosecute Al Gore now that fellow scam artist Bernie Madoff is in stir.)
To: bruinbirdman
3 more years to find ways to disguise the truth, cheat, lie, and plan our destruction.
To: bruinbirdman
Are people really that dumb to believe in this hocus pocus?
8 posted on
12/04/2009 11:52:42 PM PST by
Dallas59
(No To O -Time is going by really really really really slow.)
To: bruinbirdman
How are they going to do that when the original data has been destroyed?
9 posted on
12/04/2009 11:53:50 PM PST by
abigailsmybaby
(To understan' the livin' you got to commune wit' da dead.)
To: bruinbirdman
The BBC just trashed the Times' report. There will be no re-examination of the data. The Met Office is apparently trying to bolster Copenhagen, and sweep Climategate under the rug with their "data" that proves global warming:
...The MO has written to 188 countries for permission to publish the historic data it says proves that the world is warming up due to man-made emissions.
A spokesman denied reports ministers had tried to block the publication.
The material, dating back 160 years from more than 1,000 weather stations around the world, is expected to be released this week....
An MO spokesman denied it would spend up to three years re-examining the climate change data, and said it had already planned to publish the material long before the "Climategate" controversy broke.
Link
11 posted on
12/05/2009 12:43:22 AM PST by
browardchad
("Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own fact." - Daniel P Moynihan)
To: bruinbirdman
Which means that all climate laws should be postponed for three years at a minimum (I prefer indefinitely since AGW is a crock).
Did Boxer get that message? Umm...no.
12 posted on
12/05/2009 12:47:41 AM PST by
UAConservative
(Audemus Jura Nostra Defendere)
To: bruinbirdman; All
I am keeping a running file ( always updated ) on this fraud and scandal:
"Hadley CRU has apparently been hacked –[epic fraud?]"Click the picture:
And yes, it is a swindle- a fraud and a cheat and a scam-- a deliberately designed construct intended to con you out of things you hold dear-- money, prosperity, freedom... and a few other things, as well.
13 posted on
12/05/2009 1:48:32 AM PST by
backhoe
(All Across America, the Lights are being relit again...)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Fred Nerks; ...
Thanks Ernest_at_the_Beach.
18 posted on
12/06/2009 1:53:44 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
