Because they realize that it's counterproductive to associate themselves, and conservatives generally, with that sort of crackpottery.
What do you mean by "crackpottery?"
The public knows practically nothing about Obama. That is the issue!
The real story is the unprecedented lack of openness by our President in connection with his kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and adoption records.
If President Obama grew up poor what were his sources of funding? Who sponsored his community organizer job? What about his draft registration? Is there no controversy in that matter?
And there are many legitimate, unanswered questions in connection with his birth certificate. Why were there no hearings in connection with his satisfying the requirement to be a natural born citizen? We sure had hearings for McCain, who is clearly a natural born citizen. But we just had to have hearings on that matter for John McCain. Why not for Obama? There are questions of substance in connection with his satisfying that requirement IMO and in the opinion of many other voters in this country!
Why is it crackpottery? We just want proof, and then we will all drop it.
The resident liberal Obamanoid speaks.
No, they probably realize that to remove the fraud at this point would cause a national civil war. Is the constitution really worth all that death and destruction?