[GI Joe Fan]

Ruh-roh.

Was Governor Palin threatened by Raila Odinga's favorite cousin?

I have noticed that many high profile Conservatives (Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, etc) tend to avoid any and all discussions on the Fraud In Chief's Constitutional validity.

Why do they avoid the issue altogether?

[steve-b]

I have noticed that many high profile Conservatives (Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, etc) tend to avoid any and all discussions on the Fraud In Chief's Constitutional validity.
Why do they avoid the issue altogether?

Because they realize that it's counterproductive to associate themselves, and conservatives generally, with that sort of crackpottery.

[pissant]

At least Palin isn’t slamming the so called “birthers”, and for that, she deserves kudos. I’m sure the media will be hounding her on this, so we’ll get to see that spectacle. Buckle up Sarah, and get ready to punch back.

[RED SOUTH]

I think they calculate that the obama problem will take care of itself so no need to muddy the waters right now.
Once they get Congress back in 2010 they can make him a lot of trouble.

[freekitty]

I don’t know; but someone threatened them.

[stockpirate]

"I have noticed that many high profile Conservatives (Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, etc) tend to avoid any and all discussions on the Fraud In Chief's Constitutional validity."

"Why do they avoid the issue altogether?"

Because they are chicken sh*t's!

[wintertime]

Why do they avoid the issue altogether?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I am completely ticked!

Rush, Hannity, Beck, Coulter, Malkin, Levine, Medved, Boortz..etc....Well, I will **NEVER** trust them again! Some issues and their actions towards Obama’s eligibility are deal breakers in my opinion.

I hold special contempt for Coulter. NO POSSIBLE WAY WILL I EVER BUY ONE OF HER BOOKS AGAIN!

[New Jersey Realist]

I have noticed that many high profile Conservatives (Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, etc) tend to avoid any and all discussions on the Fraud In Chief’s Constitutional validity.

Why do they avoid the issue altogether?

---

Because and only because there was a newspaper announcement in the local paper of Obama’s birth. If anyone can convince me that handlers knew back then that Obama would become president OR hackers could possibly fabricate the announcement decades later, then I’ll also believe the Great One is a fraud. A legitimate newspaper announcement just like an obit, is real to me. I absolutely detest this amateur but I believe he was born in Hawaii. Why he doesn’t produce the birth certificate is beyond me except that maybe he is hiding something that is on it that he doesn’t like - like maybe the father’s name or something.