Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic

mmmm no- not so much tactic- I made the comment to another poster’s insinuations that Christians suppsoedly don’t hold a monopoly on ‘itnerpretations of the bible’, insinuating that the bible is just a ‘good book’ written by fallible man’, and I put that silly liberal claim to rest- I unfortunately made the mistake of saying ‘all liberals’ which you jumped on- which was your right to- but it was a mistake as anyone that knows my stand here knows I don’t generalize like that intentionally- then you, out of nowhere, accused me of ‘not udnerstanding hte difference between scriptures ideas and the wording- which was what started al lthis crap with the following:

post 602 Tactic logic: “If you’re simply here to tell me what’s wrong with my religious beliefs, then I’m here to tell you what’s wrong with yours. Fair enough?”

Post 606 Tactic Logic: “You mistake the words of the scripture for the ideas they represent, and you mistake walking around with a pie-hole full of stinkbait looking to start a fight about it for evangelism.”

Again- I made a statement about those hwo insinuate that the bible can’t be trusted, and include verses that show either the bible can be because both God and man said many times over it IS hte word of God- contrary to hte continual claims of liberals, who have one foot in one camp and hte other in another camp- wanting to be approved of bnoth camps- and you jump in and start an argument by generalizing that I ‘mistake the words of scriptuires for ideas” then go on to insult me- then you turn around and hide behind some arbitrary ‘rule’ that you live by whereby you afford yourself the luxury of insulting Christians, quesitoning their understanding of scriptures, but run and hide when they refute your claims and ask you to back up your false accusations? Swell- Whatever-

You complain about ‘discussing religious matters in a public forum’ when you want to duck challenges to your accusations-

[[I don’t think I owe you any apologies.]]

I’m not askign you for any apology- infact- All I wanted was for you to back up your claim that I ‘misunderstand scriptures ideas. If you’re goign to disparage the word of God ,insinuate that it;’s not actually the word of God, or claim or insinuate that there are ‘many interpretations’, or make claism that are contrary to His word, IN a General Forum, then I’m goign to provide evidence that refutes those claims, IN a general forum- you accused me of not udnerstanding hte ideas behind scriptures- so let’s get specific instead of hiding behind “I don’t discuss religious issues in general forums’ -You certainly had to problem dissing me by claiming, without proof or evidence, that I msunderstand scriptures, and falsely accusing me in general forums- so back it up- I’m not askign for any apologies- just that you man up and back your false accusatiosn up if you’re goign to make them in public

[[I didn’t offer any criticism of how you practice your religion until it was explicilty requested.]]

That’s BS- You began with several pretty nasty insults and false allegations- I’ve posted them above one more time- I certainly didn’t request any such false accusations and nasty remarks- not sure what the heck you’re talking about there?


646 posted on 12/06/2009 11:04:19 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 645 | View Replies ]


To: CottShop

You started throwing insuults at 583. Show me anything insulting I posted to you before that, and I’ll apologize. If you can’t do that then we’re done.


647 posted on 12/07/2009 3:30:59 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson