You started throwing insuults at 583. Show me anything insulting I posted to you before that, and I’ll apologize. If you can’t do that then we’re done.
it isn’t an insult to say that someone is ignorant of a subject when they are infact ignorant of a subject- your quote (and I assumed agreement with said quote) of payne showed an ignorance of our founding fathers and their reliance on God and Christian morals when framing our constitution, and showed an ignorance of the bible by claiming falsley that it was so error riddled as to be untrustworthy, and supposeldy making it the word of man as opposed to the word of God. I simpyl challenged you to check out hte care and serious reverence with which the scribes put toward transcribing God’s word which woudl have exposed the lie that God’s word is ‘full of errors’, and I stand by that challenge to you, as it seems you and others who continually make the false claims are unaware of how carefully and reverently the scribes did their jobs. For instance- I’m willing to bet that you are not aware that scribes who made even a 1 letter mistake threw the whole page away, and prayerfully asked God for guidance to avoid such mistakes again before takign up the task of transcribing again-
“All of those scribes were as careful as humans are capable of, and most of them truly believed that they would be banished to Hell if they made even a single copying error! But the Bible contains around 800,000 words and around three million characters. Extremely careful comparison between the thousands of different scribe copies that still exist have found some very minor copying errors in some of the existing copies of the earlier original Manuscripts. None of them have changed any significant wording or belief.”
“It truly is a remarkable achievement by the many hundreds of Scribes who had to copy the entire Bible that they made astoundingly few copying errors!”
The task of transcribing the bible was taken VERY seriously by these scribes, and it was a mssive undertaking and it was amazing how few errors there were in the end, and for payne to claim what he did, and for people/skeptics to claim what they do, is an unfounded accusation based on ignorance of just how carefully and error free the transcribed bible really is. Peoplel ike Merrit, who obviously have an aganda agaisnt hte bible have scoured God’s word looking, hoping, to find contradictions ,and wh3en they can’t find them, they simply make up false accusations that have been refuted time and time again, yet people who really could care less about the innerancy of God’s word glom onto spurious claims fro mthe likes of Merrit regardless of hte FACT that their claims have no truth to them- I’d hope you- a person who claims objectivity, would not fal linto that category, and for htem ost part you stear clear of generalizations, but by posting payne, it would seem you did so in approval of what he said, and hterefore, as a challenge to the innerancy of God’s word, I provide evidnece refuting such claims, and refutign his, and by extension your claim, that the bible isn’t supposedly God’s word- a statement which, when examined agaisnt hte actual evidence, shows an ignorance of the subject-
As for my comment about liberals and evos lack of ammunition by throwing htese false claism out there- I stand by that comment, and stand by the fact that even these comments thrown out as ammunition are weak and do not stand the test when the evidence is presented- which is why I challenged you to try to show how ‘error prone the bible was suppsoed to be’ and how it was suppsoedly the ‘word of man’ as opposed to hte word of God