[[If it’s not about your free exercise of religion, then it’s off topic in this forum. If you want to discuss purely religous issues, there is a forum for that, but this is not it. I believe that’s perfectly in line with Jim Robinson’s comments on the issue.]]
LOL- still gonna run away with tail tucked between your legs after biting at the backsides of Christians whiel htey weren’t looking eh? & Bzzzzt- Jim has not stated that religious discussions have to takep lace only in the religious forums- and this thread’s topic isn’t about attacks on religious freedoms- it’s about scientists backign off ardi claims- Cripes- it appears al lyou can do is sneak aroudn and nip at Christians whgile hteir backs are turned, then run away when they cal lyou to the carpet to back up your accusations- you sir are the one who began the discussion abotu God’s word, and made the claism that I ‘don’t understand the ideas behind scriptures’, and now you’re gonna just hit and run? Typical- I never for a minute expected you would present a valid argument after making spurious and unsupported accusations- per usual.
you sir turn htis into a religious discussion and hten run away when your claims are confronted by claiming we ‘can’t discuss religious issues’ in public forums? LOL- Whatever- keep spinning- keep running- you know full well many threads on FR discuss religious issues front and center- and hwen religious discussions have to be relegated to back room discussions, let me know- till then, I’ll discuss and defend my religious beliefs against false accusations out in the open when htose accusatiosn are made out i nthe open- last I looked, we’re stil lfree to discuss religion in public, and I’m pretty sure Jim would agree to that
I commented on the unreliability of your use of peoples religion beliefs as a test of their political persuasion. Period. You tried to turn it into a religious discussion and I won't follow you, and you're all bent out of shape about it.