I commented on the unreliability of your use of peoples religion beliefs as a test of their political persuasion. Period. You tried to turn it into a religious discussion and I won't follow you, and you're all bent out of shape about it.
[[I commented on the unreliability of your use of peoples religion beliefs as a test of their political persuasion. Period.]]
no- you put words in my mouth that I never said- which I addressed in my response to your false accusations- so I won’t go over that again- however, that’s not all you delved into
[[You tried to turn it into a religious discussion and I won’t follow you, and you’re all bent out of shape about it.]]
Mmmm- No spanky- YOU made claims that were untrue, and I asked you to back them up- you refused- per usual, and are now tryign to turn this around by feinging innocent. You also brought up the issue that there are ‘many interpretations, and you accused me of not understandign hte difference between the ideas behind scripture, and the wording- which I’ve asked you several times to back up.
You folsk are all alike- You make spurious claims, then run away when asked to back your claims up, and when confronted with the evidence which refutes your claims- and while running, you throw a couple of parting insults and insinuations that iot’s ‘al lthe fault of the Christians or creationists’ for ‘not understanding scriptures, mot understanding science, and tryign to ‘turn the discussions into religious ones’
As I said before, and wil lstate once again, so that peopel aren’t confused by your double standars and false claims, when you call into quesiton the tennants of Cghristianity, and make claism that are supported biblically, then expect to be caleld to the carpet for it- making those false claims, then hiding behind more false claims, doesn’t help your cause one bit- it simpyl hsows that all you’re willign to do is get as many jabs in against Christians- TRUE Christians as you can, then run away when the fire is put to your feet.