Don’t get too excited about this. It could be a complete fabrication, with falsified data and all. Remember this is from Nature. Didn’t they recently come out defending the UEA Climate Frauds, and claiming they did nothing wrong?
Birds of a feather...
Remember this is from Nature News citing an article in Science. Does Climategate mean no science or science reporting is credible anymore? Do you want to reject all science? You don't have to compound the damage that Climategate caused. Real scientists keep an open mind, but maintain a certain scepticism about anything claimed to be new. Just because Climategate is a disaster for climatology and some reporting doesn't mean that the rest of science and science reporting is corrupted.