Remember this is from Nature News citing an article in Science. Does Climategate mean no science or science reporting is credible anymore? Do you want to reject all science? You don't have to compound the damage that Climategate caused. Real scientists keep an open mind, but maintain a certain scepticism about anything claimed to be new. Just because Climategate is a disaster for climatology and some reporting doesn't mean that the rest of science and science reporting is corrupted.
Breastfeeding May Reduce Diabetes Risk - Lactation History Linked to Less Metabolic Syndrome
Salmonella: Drug-Resistant Strain of Bacteria Gains in Africa, With High Death Rates
Deadliest animal disease on the brink of eradication
FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.
How do we know the difference between "science", "political lies" or grant pumping?
And is GE the new tobacco executives telling us "it doesn't cause cancer"... I'd trust Bernie Madoff more...
My previous post: Hyperbole
Or has been said elsewhere: “Illustrate absurdity by being absurd...”