Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dan Walters: California debt may be half a trillion dollars
Sacramento Bee ^ | 11/29/9 | Dan Walters

Posted on 11/29/2009 8:42:40 AM PST by SmithL

Just days before Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and legislators finalized a water package, including an $11.1 billion bond issue, state Treasurer Bill Lockyer warned them not to do it.

California is already deeply in debt, Lockyer warned, has huge budget deficits and can't afford another big bond issue.

"The days of blithely heaping more and more debt burden on the general fund are over – at least they should be," Lockyer said.

The earmark-laden bond issue, the package's single most controversial element, raises an interesting question: Just how deeply in debt are our state and local governments?

The answer: No one knows for certain, since debt is scattered through myriad agencies in many forms, but well over a half-trillion dollars is a fair estimate.

Lockyer's warning pertained to the state's "general obligation debt," which currently stands at $59 billion, and there are an additional $50-plus billion in general obligation bonds that have not yet been sold. The biggest chunks of debt, however, are the unfunded obligations for pensions and health care of retired public employees.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: debt; ebaybillionairess; goldenstate; governorwhitman; megwhitman; megwillsaveus; rino; rinos; rinos4meg; rinoslovemegsmoney; yourtaxdollarsatwork
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last
To: SmithL

They have been issuing bonds lately. It’s all worthless paper.


41 posted on 11/29/2009 5:17:18 PM PST by rbosque (10 year Freeper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: immadashell

it has everything to do with govt pensions, paychecks, and medical benefits....


42 posted on 11/30/2009 2:18:28 AM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball
One of the problems is that the mass transit systems keep trying to operate as social experiments.

This particular train system being proposed would be inter-city, between LA and San Francisco. These never work without heavy gubmint subsidies because the cost of building and maintaining it far, far outweigh the cost and benefits of transporting a few hundred people at a time. Flying is cheaper and much, much more cost effective. There simply is no comparison when you look at the real cost per mile of travel per passenger.

Otherwise, I would agree with your comments. Atlanta has tried the same thing with MARTA, i.e. the Metro Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority. I rode the "M" train every day for about 4 months shortly after I got out of grad school to a job I took in downtown Atlanta. There was no parking in downtown Atlanta that was affordable and the traffic is horrendous. After witnessing a shoot out between gang bangers at the Five Points Station one afternoon on the way home, I decided riding the "M" train to save on parking and traffic tie ups really wasn't worth risking my life over.....

43 posted on 11/30/2009 5:38:19 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson