[FreedomPoster]

>>Many posters here need to reread the article

I’d say you’re the one who needs to re-read the article. Did you manage to read the part about her riding into the herd screaming? If not, you should consider it carefully.

>.I put the lady’s right to access above that of the sheep herder, who has, more likely than not, hired illegal aliens to watch the herd.

That’s one helluva assumption. You know what they say about assumptions.

So basically, you didn’t read the article closely, and make a bogus assumption, while ignoring the fact that this woman took a really, really stupid action that provoked the protection training of these dogs. This is the equivalent of waving a toy gun at me “in fun”. It won’t end well.

[FreedomPoster]

Looks like we’re on the same page with this one.

[Nephi]

I’d say you’re the one who needs to re-read the article. Did you manage to read the part about her riding into the herd screaming? If not, you should consider it carefully.

You mean, after the part about it being an ORGANIZED RACE? So, because the woman got scared and screamed you think she deserved to be shredded by the dogs?
Or, the part about campers rather than the "professional Peruvian sheep herders" rescuing the screaming woman?

Btw, FP, did you read post #35?