Posted on 11/27/2009 1:27:45 PM PST by Reaganesque
I guess I should believe the Romney shill instead of my lyin' eyes... /Richard Pryor mode
Rush did NOT say Romney was a 3-leg conservative. He only said he more closely resembled one than McCain or Huckabee, in 2008. No sale, McRomneybee.
It’s not going to happen man. I don’t know if it’s going to be Mitt or not, but it won’t be Palin. Far too many of us just didn’t drink the Kool-Aid
Does not being as famous as those people make Jim's opinion *less* valuable than theirs?
I don't think so.
You mean, Jim Robinson could be wrong too?
I’m not better than anyone, but it’s a simple task to look at a man’s record and see the results of his governance. Romney’s no conservative. He’s a baby murdering big government socialist pig! And you can tell him I said so.
Why don’t you please tell us exactly where Romney is being lied about regarding his past support of abortion and his ongoing support of Romneycare?
You mean, Jim Robinson could be wrong too?
We all can and are, at various times. But, this isn't one of them for Jim Robinson... :-)
**What makes your opinion more valuable than theirs?**
He OWNS this forum... THAT makes it a little more valuable.
Plus he owns the ZOT button..
Either way you might as well GIVE UP... YOU WILL NOT WIN against Jim or the rest of us..besides...it’s making you Sound like a RON PAUL Supporter.
Maggie Marshall, the immigrant from South Africa who became Chief Justice in MA was the one behind that, not Romney.
Mitt may have that third leg, but what kind of wood is that leg made of? Balsa wood?
About the only litmus test that matters right now: “Is a candidate federalist or anti-federalist?”
Because *this* is the argument from which all others devolve.
The anti-federalists are pro-national government. This means that they are in favor of the federal government bloat, the national government legalizing abortion at the national level, the enormous national debt, the gigantic budgets, using the US military as the world’s policemen, signing dubious foreign treaties and other internationalism, regulating every aspect of our personal lives, and taxing the pluperfect hell out of us on one side, and paying out vast amounts of largesse on the other.
It doesn’t matter what they *say*. It matters what they *do*. And if they support these things, at ANY time, they are anti-federalists.
And the federalists, who believe in a limited federal government of the individual States, with limited powers, a balanced budget, concerned with our *nation*, not with the games of foreign tyrants and internationalists, and want the balance of power restored between the national government and the individual States, have had enough of the antics of the anti-federalists.
So when you see a Republican, or even a Democrat candidate for office, *the* question to ask them *first* is:
“ARE YOU A FEDERALIST, OR ARE YOU AN ANTI-FEDERALIST?”
If they don’t know, or hem and haw, or try to say that they are equally important, or otherwise speak with a forked tongue, tell them that they are an anti-federalist, and that you WILL NOT VOTE FOR THEM because of it.
Did you just post a an almost two year old article in Breaking News?
Are you afraid to admit what’s obviously the truth about the man’s record? Did he not wholeheartedly and knowingly argue for a woman’s “right to choose” to murder her unborn child? Did he not propose and bring forth his draconian socialist big government freedom killing RomneyCare bill and sign it into law with the smiling approval of Ted Kennedy and his Demoncrat socialist fiends?
Truth is not slander. The truth speaks for itself! Liars try to hide it.
Sometime more so because they are true believers...
STILL pushing the abortionist Romney. LOL
What a dope you are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.