Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: antiRepublicrat
</i>But that is a different problem. This is about the military’s policy for treatment of EPWs, completely different from rules of engagement.</i>

No it is not. The goal of the socialist communists are to treat enemy combatants better than they would treat a gang member or thug on the streets of the United States. The political correct would have you believe with these murderers they are actually human. If the United States were actually serious about winning a war against terrorism they would take the cuffs off our military and let them win using whatever tactics and enforce necessary to ensure a total victory. The Commanders in WWII had no doubts about their decisions when it came to total victory. They used any and all methods to secure that victory. But then they still had willing a free press that was largely patriotic to sing their praises when they were victorious. Unlike today the media or state controlled media are in bed with the socialist communists and love to hate our military and take joy in playing up these BS stories of so called atrocities against our military members. Mainly always the enlisted that do the dirty work for this country while the officers cower and gladly throw them under the buss to protect their political asses from the limelight.

79 posted on 11/27/2009 10:55:23 AM PST by Irisshlass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: Irisshlass
The Commanders in WWII had no doubts about their decisions when it came to total victory.

And they also gave strict orders for treatment of EPWs. Would you people please understand the difference between combat and treatment of prisoners!

86 posted on 11/27/2009 11:10:25 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson