Replies

The difference in WWII and the way we fight today, they adhered to Geneva Convention Rules during WWII. And they did their best to follow those rules unlike the nazis and other members of the axis powers who tortured and abuse their prisoners. But in the Geneva Convention these accords are only granted to uniformed military prisoners not those in civilian attire who blend nicely in with the population. So by them declaring a war on us and having no regard for rules of engagement or the treatment of prisoners they should be treated and dealt with like the barbaric animals that they are. What you also fail to realize is under the new rules of engagement from the Ocommie administration such as don't fire unless you are fired upon and the kid glove treatment of these animals you have and one in the same doctrine of lets play war with both hands tied behind our backs and do everything we can to kiss the enemy's ass so as not to offend the muslim world.

If you were in combat as you say you were and you had been captured by these animals how do you think you would of been treated. Would you have been given three hots and a cot? A prayer rug? A nice exercise area? And your Bible to read at will? Would you have been read your Miranda rights and treated with the up most respect? Needless to say you probably would of been shot immediately or used to make the next beheading video for YouTube. Not to say that you probably need a haircut anyway. But besides that you know exactly in your little political correct mind how you would of been treated. So stay in the little fantasy world of the clintons and the gores and the ocommies and see what the view is like in a couple of years.