Posted on 11/26/2009 11:12:49 AM PST by SmithL
When the make-love-not-war generation finally got around to having kids, they were so proud of their accomplishment that they fawned over the little darlings and protectively adorned their minivans with yellow caution signs that warned of precious cargo: "Baby on Board."
Now, after many years of being told they were special and entitled to endless conveniences and a life without turmoil, the children are grown up. And the University of California system, which has recently endured student protests and arrests over a fee hike, has to contend with the byproduct: Brats at the Gates.
The protests erupted after UC regents voted to increase tuition by 32 percent to help close a $535 million budget gap. University officials say the fee increase will raise $505 million and prevent more cuts into student services.
Hundreds of students have turned out at campuses throughout the state. Fourteen students were arrested at UCLA, where the regents were meeting. Forty-one were arrested at UC Berkeley. More than 50 students were arrested at UC Davis. And about 70 occupied a university building at UC Santa Cruz for three days, before finally evacuating when threatened with arrest. Officials say some of those students may still be arrested and charged with damaging university property.
...Moreover, those of us who complain that the Twitter generation is apathetic should be encouraged that students finally awoke and took to the streets - for any cause at all.
And so the protesters might actually have come out of this looking good - if they had never opened their mouths. But they did, and some of what came out was ludicrous. The rest was downright offensive, especially when students broke out in choruses of "We Shall Overcome."
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
Your "Make it easier", you dopes, is cheaper, gubmint-guaranteed college loans, which causes your schools to jack up your tuition rates even faster.
Not that you're smart enough to put two and two together, but:
You voted for this.
...and who did these students, and their families vote for in 2008...2006...2004...2002...
As Rush likes to say, elections have consequences. They have voted to bankrupt the state and now complain that there is no money.
These poor college kids. (sarcasm)
Yes a 30+% increase in their costs is huge. But, are we saying that going to college is a “right”, and that there is a “right” to go to college at a certain cost out of pocket?
They will have to tighten their belts and plan their budgets. But this is something that we all do in the real world every day. This is a good life lesson for these kids. Maybe some will have to work their way through college. Maybe some will have bigger loans to pay back. But they will still make the needed adjustments to make it work. And the smart ones will adapt and get through it without all these protest marches.
I don't see why they shouldn't be allowed to protest. Thirty-two percent is a HUGE increase. Heck, I complained when my cleaners went up 50% on the wash & fold, from $1 a pound to $1.50 a pound.
All America is taking a punch. It's part of the spreading the wealth due to the communists King Obama's taking America down. Millions lost jobs. Spending has fallen off to save for the up and coming depression. Retail tax went up here in Kalifornia. Regan income tax will be not renewed and current income tax increased 10%. On and on. We all are suffering so get used to it. Anyway what good is your education if there are no jobs for your pressure as@. I'm pis@ed.
Berkeley students have always been silly, spoiled brats. Well, at least since the Sixties.
I smile a little at the obligatory sneering at the Boomers. A freshman matriculating this year was born, on the average, in 1991. Her parents weren't shouting "peace and love" in the 60's. Most of them weren't born yet.
“But, are we saying that going to college is a “right”, and that there is a “right” to go to college at a certain cost out of pocket?”
Actually, I don’t completely agree. I think that the students do have a right to expect reasonably stable prices while they attend, and that failure to keep the prices stable is a failure of the government. That’s why I like to take them back to the voting booth when they complain, and explain that this is the government they voted for.
It’s going to get worse for you UC students. When you have lost your freedom; you will be made to work for the government; lose your cell phone, your tv, your car, trips to the mall, trips to just about anywhere without permission; your abiity to make a good living and to suceed.
Oh you hope and changey voters; you are in for a very rough ride.
“But university officials claim that students whose families make less than $70,000 a year will have their tuition covered.”
There is a big part of the problem. If this group were required to pay at least $1,000-$2,500 each, I’ll bet that the tuition increase required would have been considerably less. Maybe the kids who are getting the free ride could work a little bit to earn part of their tuition.
On another note I was recently rejected for employment by a company because I went to a state university instead of a big name school. I guess the hiring manager didn't think my school was good enough for his pompous company. I guess they would rather have the person who could afford a fancy name school rather than someone who worked their way thru a state university.
Thanks, I’m definitely the ant. I’ve stored up EVERY non-perishable item that I can think of, down to shoe laces. I’m also stocking up on more expensive stuff, since I know it’s only a matter of time before our currency is devalued, and things become much more expensive, and potentially unavailable (if we get into price controls again...which would not surprise me with this bunch).
So I consider myself in pretty good shape...for a while.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.