I don't know if this is newsworthy, I don't know if it will be relevant. I am certain it will be voyeuristic, painful to many, and I am aware that someone at HuffingtonPost was tipped off ahead of time and got the exclusive.
To: All; backhoe; Velveeta; Oorang
2 posted on
11/25/2009 1:40:52 AM PST by
Cindy
To: JerseyHighlander
I think this is fascinating -- thanks for posting. I for one will be checking out this information feed with interest.
The article says:
> We hope that its revelation will lead to a more nuanced understanding of the event and its tragic consequences.
I wonder what they mean by this? "Nuanced" in what way? Wouldn't it instead provide a "more complete" understanding? Or an "understanding of the sequence of information and events"? Or "an understanding of the information provenance as events unfolded"?
There is nothing "nuanced" about a time-sequential list of messages at all.
Nuanced? Exactly what the Devil do they mean by that? Some pointy-headed intellectual no doubt, trying to appear as if he/she is in possession of an impressively nuanced vocabulary. BAH!/rant
3 posted on
11/25/2009 2:27:22 AM PST by
DieHard the Hunter
(Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fà g am bealach.)
To: JerseyHighlander
Distraction from Climategate? (adjusting tin foil)
To: JerseyHighlander
How did they get these and why are they revealing them? There are personal messages in these with peoples names and phone numbers.
8 posted on
11/25/2009 3:03:23 AM PST by
visualops
(Freepin' Pre!)
To: JerseyHighlander
I saw nothing of interest in any of the files. (none of them were during or after the events of that day that I could find)
Where is the *relevant* info.
12 posted on
11/25/2009 4:59:36 AM PST by
wolfcreek
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson