[JerseyHighlander]

I don't know if this is newsworthy, I don't know if it will be relevant. I am certain it will be voyeuristic, painful to many, and I am aware that someone at HuffingtonPost was tipped off ahead of time and got the exclusive.

[Cindy]

ON THE INTERNET:

http://911.wikileaks.org/files/index.html

[DieHard the Hunter]

I think this is fascinating -- thanks for posting. I for one will be checking out this information feed with interest.

The article says:

> We hope that its revelation will lead to a more nuanced understanding of the event and its tragic consequences.

I wonder what they mean by this? "Nuanced" in what way? Wouldn't it instead provide a "more complete" understanding? Or an "understanding of the sequence of information and events"? Or "an understanding of the information provenance as events unfolded"?

There is nothing "nuanced" about a time-sequential list of messages at all.

Nuanced? Exactly what the Devil do they mean by that? Some pointy-headed intellectual no doubt, trying to appear as if he/she is in possession of an impressively nuanced vocabulary. BAH!/rant

[Free State Four]

Distraction from Climategate? (adjusting tin foil)

[visualops]

How did they get these and why are they revealing them? There are personal messages in these with peoples names and phone numbers.

[wolfcreek]

I saw nothing of interest in any of the files. (none of them were during or after the events of that day that I could find)

Where is the *relevant* info.