Blunderer in Chief

I’ve read the dictionary definition of blunderer (2: to make a mistake through stupidity, ignorance, or carelessness), and I it believe it is somewhat incomplete.

There is another aspect to blundering that is missing from this definition, and it centers about ego and blind arrogance.

While I fully agree with the Webster definition, it seems that many blunders are less chance events, and more driven by egocentric individuals, blinded by their own will and arrogance.

Napoleon’s and Hitler’s invasions of Russia. Custer’s final battle with the Sioux. The United States’ escalation in Vietnam.

Napoleon should have recognized that the sheer size of Russia made it impossible to hold or subjugate, even if it could be have been conquered.

By many accounts Custer lacked an appreciation of the Sioux’s battlefield skills, and he is known for having over-inflated his own tactical abilities. He gave a demonstration of this lack of respect for the enemy by dividing his forces and pursuing the offense in spite of many tactical clues that could have resulted in far less devastation to the 7th Cavalry at Little Big Horn.

Hitler should have learned from Napoleon, and he should have also considered the items added by me above. He should have also been able to predict that opening a second front, one that dwarfed the first front in its vastness, would be problematic for many reasons, but it is well known that sound strategy and logic was rejected in favor of his egotism.

Collectively, the United States overestimated its post-World War Two abilities and grossly underestimated the powerful nationalistic force that drove the North Vietnamese. Early we were only lightly engaged as advisors, but we quickly and arrogantly turned it into a war infused with business like calculations and predictive results that centered only on our view of the world, our calculations, and our massive military capability. We completely, and arrogantly, blundered into a war that would bog us down for more than a decade by ignoring other inputs, such as the will and motivation of our adversary and their determination to defeat us. We were befuddled and mystified when they did.

Webster should find away to work the words, arrogance, blinded and ego into their definition.

President Obama is lining up two make two of the largest blunders he could make as a President, and both will cost American lives.

Not his health care rationing and economic redistribution plan. Not his farcical “stimulus” program, which is nothing more than a higher form of vote buying. And not the Administration’s fumbling of the H1N1 vaccine program.

I am talking about Obama’s new role as Military-Tactician-in-Chief and his adjunct role as Prosecutor-in-Chief.

Each of the Services has an operational planning school for senior captains. In the Marine Corps this school is known as Amphibious Warfare School. Graduates leave the school with an in depth knowledge of operational planning and staff planning for amphibious operations.

One of the techniques used to focus planning efforts is the development of courses of action or “COAs.” In COA development, captains are limited to developing only three possible plans. What becomes readily apparent after a couple of these planning exercises, is that there are rarely three equally appealing COAs to choose from.

One COA typically stands out as being the best strategic choice based on lessons learned from similar operations and a reasonable comparison to the well understood Principles of War.

The next COA is often appealing from an “outside-the-box” perspective, because it is not typically the “textbook” solution. But COA number two almost always has more inherent risk.

COA three is usually a non-starter. It generally falls far from conventional wisdom and experience, and it usually carries an inordinate amount of risk compared to the other choices.

Yet the President has rejected our best military planners’ options asking them to go back to the table to develop CAO number five.

This is unheard of; not because military planners are stubborn as mules and goats (Go Navy; beat Army), but because an elemental application of the Principles of War, the terrain, the enemy capabilities, lines of communication, weaponry, communications and connectivity, and myriad of applicable factors will necessarily cull the number of realistic choices to a number below three. Certainly not a number greater than or equal to, five.

The President’s blind desire to please the left wing of his party will place the strategic responsibility for Afghanistan solely at his feet as he has rejected the best advice his planners can give in favor of a choice that is no better than fifth from a strategic point of view.

Mr. Obama is jeopardizing our troops’ lives by fighting with an unwinnable playbook and blundering into the abyss of Afghanistan with a strategy ultimately devised by the radicals of his party and the marionette grinner, Joe Biden. Maybe Al Gore could chime in.

He blunders further by insisting that five murderous terrorists be given habeas corpus rights and a public trial in New York City, and then guaranteeing the results of such a trial.

In his efforts to complete the demonization of the Gitmo detention facility and the Bush Administration by trying these enemies in open court, he has put New Yorkers at great risk. He is committing the classic McNamara underestimation. Terrorists will not appreciate the openness and transparency of our judicial system, but they will greatly appreciate that we have now given them a new target at which to concentrate their aim.

The city of New York will be racked by terrorist events large and small, and it will be at the invitation of the Obama Administration. Justice could have easily been served off-shore in a manner that did not invite undue attention to our soil, but these trials, and New York itself, will become the new bulls-eye for terror activity. And there will be many taking aim.

Imagine the price Al Qaeda will pay the families of successful bombers if they disrupt the trials, or cause the trials to be eventually moved. Imagine the loss of respect the United States will suffer and the boom in recruiting all rogue terror groups will enjoy. Bringing these trials to New York is a completely unnecessary move that will, quite literally, blow up in the Obama Administration’s face.

In both cases, the Obama Administration is wandering far from common sense, and they are trying to sell their silliness and irresponsibility with hollow guarantees, clever buzzwords, and a promise of vacuous and immeasurable results (hybrid strategy; transparent jurisprudence e.g.).

Make no mistake, while the Obama team is confusing itself with nonsensical strategies and inane prosecutorial practices, Al Qaeda and the Taliban will be preparing to light up the scoreboard with American lives both in Afghanistan and in NYC.

When the numbers of casualties go up in Afghanistan and a number of bombs go off in New York, and the Obama Administration will dither at an even higher frequency and they will wonder how it was they became the Best and the Brightest, part two.

Agree with most of this article.

Viet Nam on the other hand, although pretty accurate in the assessment, was a won war.

We won every battle.

The commie leaders were about to surrender.

Where we lost was by capitulating to Kerry, Fonda et al and not stopping them and their anti-American cohorts in their tracks and locking them up and trying them for sedition as traitors.

Now Obama is the Kerry/Fonda of our day.

It is arrogance AND incompetence JUST as you say.

That said, I also believe that “O” is truly unaware of what America IS… he is not aware of what the U.S. is in and of itself and what the U.S. MEANS to the world.

Unfortunately, “O” typifies what public education has done to the national consciousness.

He is one of many young people who have no understanding of, or respect for service to the country, NO perception of the domestic evolution of this country, NO appreciation of our established national character… and who only know what America secures, promises and guarantees… but who do NOT comprehend the LEAST of what America expects in return …and the very LEAST is allegiance.

The MSM and Hollywood have long since made a perfect joke of patriotism and national pride. Anyone who bought THAT hype, has built their house on sand. Who can you be and what can you achieve if you despise and mock your own traditions? You end up with a national leader like “O”, who respects nothing and no one above or outside of himself.

encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about the metaphor. For the short story by Edgar Allan Poe, see The Imp of the Perverse (short story) .
The Imp of the Perverse is a metaphor for the common tendency, particularly among children and miscreants, to do exactly the wrong thing in a given situation. The concept is that the misbehavior is due to an imp (a small demon) leading an otherwise decent person into mischief.

The phrase has a long history in literature, and was popularized (and perhaps coined) by Edgar Allan Poe in his short story, “The Imp of the Perverse”.

We have a task before us which must be speedily performed. We know that it will be ruinous to make delay. The most important crisis of our life calls, trumpet-tongued, for immediate energy and action. ... It must, it shall be undertaken to-day, and yet we put it off until to-morrow, and why? There is no answer, except that we feel perverse, using the word with no comprehension of the principle. ... [Then] The clock strikes, and is the knell of our welfare. At the same time, it is the chanticleer-note to the ghost that has so long overawed us. It flies - it disappears - we are free. The old energy returns. We will labor now. Alas, it is too late! [1]
Poe explores this impulse through several of his fictional characters, the narrators in “The Black Cat”[1] and in “The Tell-Tale Heart”.[2]

[edit] Examples
The Imp of the Perverse is also exemplified in The Bad Glazier, a prose poem by Charles Baudelaire.

The concept also figures prominently in the motives of Jack Shaftoe, a swashbuckling protagonist in Neal Stephenson’s trilogy The Baroque Cycle:

But here was a rare opportunity for stupidity even more flagrant and glorious.
Now, Bob, who’d been observing Jack carefully for many years, had observed that when these moments arrived, Jack was almost invariably possessed by something that Bob had heard about in Church called the Imp of the Perverse. Bob was convinced that the Imp of the Perverse rode invisibly on Jack’s shoulder whispering bad ideas into his ear, and that the only counterbalance was Bob himself, standing alongsides counseling good sense, prudence, caution, and other Puritan virtues.
But Bob was in England.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

The above is an interesting concept commonly attributed to the immortal Edgar Allen Poe, a writer who grows in my estimation every time I read something written in recent years.

On the other hand The Imp of the Perverse seems to be too innocent an explanation for the actions of Obama, Pelosi and crew. I think we are witnessing pure, condensed and concentrated evil in action.

I would think that a normal person who becomes CINC, during war time on two fronts,
without having the barest hint of a military background ,
would ask the military to set them up with some form of compressed BCT and AIT .
Followed with some form of tailored leadership training and mini OCS or WLC.
And every spare moment in the 16-18 hr days would be filled with strategy sessions and tutorials.
Having a mentally ill dope like Barry become Commander in Chief
is like taking a preschooler
and telling them to run a nuclear power plant or pilot a 777.
The greenest 18 yr old recruit has more military knowledge
than this moron.
Barry wasted two months after the election vacationing and lounging and reading beach novels.
And he didn’t even start thinking about Afghanistan until just recently.
He had his first meeting with his entire Joint Chiefs
about three weeks ago.
The White House likes to brag that Barry has spent 20 hrs working on Afghanistan.
It took my son longer than that just to get there.
BTW-His topless picture from his Hawaii three week vacation in Dec 08 now adorns one of the supermarket tabloids
with a glaring title about a gay scandal.

Excellent article.
As I posted earlier military leaders are taught
never to reinforce failure, it’s something that only
increases the cost of failure.

Our military would not have asked for these men if
WE WERE LOSING. They ask for them to insure our success.

Now Dear Leader One is only going to give them part of
what they ask for to succeed thereby lessening our chance
of winning. Is this the action of a leader?

20 hours? I am inpressed, why I almost spent that much
time on my cutting my toenails last year.

Yassir Arafat had that imp riding on his shoulder all
his life, now he’s moved over to Obama’s.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.