Posted on 11/23/2009 9:39:37 PM PST by JohnRLott
Scientific progress depends on accurate and complete data. It also relies on replication. The past couple of days have uncovered some shocking revelations about the baloney practices that pass as sound science about climate change.
It was announced Thursday afternoon that computer hackers had obtained 160 megabytes of e-mails from the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) in England. Those e-mails involved communication among many scientific researchers and policy advocates with similar ideological positions all across the world. Those purported authorities were brazenly discussing the destruction and hiding of data that did not support global-warming claims.
Professor Phil Jones, the head of the Climate Research Unit, and professor Michael E. Mann at Pennsylvania State University, who has been an important scientist in the climate debate, have come under particular scrutiny. Among his e-mails, Mr. Jones talked to Mr. Mann about the "trick of adding in the real temps to each series ... to hide the decline [in temperature]." . . .
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
So, dare one ask where this 160 megabytes of information may be downloaded? Obviously not from NYT, but since “hackers” obtained the information perhaps NYT is not the primary/sole source of the information.
All it would take is a URL. Anyone with ideas/information on this subject?
bump for later
Click the picture:
But I can’t help thinking of all the trillions of dollars that have been wasted pursuing this obvious garbage and policies and politics based thereon!
I’m sorry. The non-scientists of the world, much less the non-elite-scientists of the world, were readily able to sort out years ago that global warming, even if it was occuring, was a natural, not man-made, nor man-stoppable phenomenon.
You get a LOUD AMEN to that one!
Wow. You need to take your post and write it up as an article or blog post and publish it somewhere so the info can get circulating.
Excellent!
Yes. I would at least like an accounting of the total amount of taxpayer monies these frauds sucked in.
Scientific progress depends on accurate and complete data. It also relies on replication. The past couple of days have uncovered some shocking revelations about the baloney practices that pass as sound science about climate change.
Ummmm..., those revelations were made in the video documentary about "Anthropogenic Global Warming" below... :-)
Its one thing to gripe and complain about these things and disagree with it, but its quite another to convince your friends and neighbors and relatives and coworkers...
THEREFORE..., its also absolutely necessary for people to know the information in the following documentary. If there were simply one video that you could see and/or show people you know... this would be the one...
The following is an excellent video documentary on the so-called Global Warming I would recommend it to all FReepers. Its a very well-made documentary.
The Great Global Warming Swindle
If you want to download it, via a BitTorrent site (using a BitTorrent client), you can get it at the following link. Information about BitTorrent protocol and BitTorrent clients and their comparison at these three links (in this sentence). Some additional BitTorrent information here and here.
Download it here...
http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/3635222/The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle
[This is a high-quality copy, of about a gigabyte in size. This link is the information about it, and you have to click the download link to get it on your BitTorrent client software. You'll also find users' comments here, too.]
Its worth seeing and having for relatives, friends, neighbors and coworkers to see.
Also, see it online here...
http://www.moviesfoundonline.com/great_global_warming_swindle.php
[this one is considerably lower quality, is a flash video and viewable online, of course..., and also, you can download flash video on a website either yourself or some software doing it.]
Buy it on DVD here...
[this would be the very highest quality version, on a DVD disk, of several gigabytes in size...] At Amazon, it seems to be high-priced now and have only a few copies right now.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000WLUXZE
At WAGtv (a UK shop), but don't know about shipping. The price is reasonable, though.
https://www.wagtv.com/product/The-Great-Global-Warming-Swindle-322.html
[And..., some information from WAGtv about this item.]
Also, in split parts on YouTube...
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 1 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TqqWJugXzs
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 2 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5rGpDMN8lw
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 3 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzFL6Ixe_bo
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 4 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNQy2rT_dvU
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 5 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dzIMXGI6k8
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 6 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GjOgQN1Jco
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 7 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHI2GfbfrYw
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 8 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7N9benJh3Lw
The Great Global Warming Swindle - Credits (Part 9 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_1ifP-ri58
Of course, I would expect it if they were real newsmen but they are propagandists with an agenda.
Exactly, but people are gullible and these people had an agenda supported by governments, they had to find the politically correct results to keep the money coming.
Just think of it as welfare for scientists. Now, doesn’t that make you feel all warm and fuzzy?
Ah, but the Global Warming Guys were ahead of this! About a year ago, they changed the name of their scam to “Climate Change”
That way, their “loathsome spotty behinds”* are covered no matter WHAT happens to the planet!
*Monty Python hat tip!
I do too but only after they have their pants sued off and they and their families lose everything that their ill-gotten gains have bought.
It feels good to be proved right!
He was all over it yesterday on the Radio.
And a lot of fired discredited Scientists and researchers.
That graph was based off of the ONLY 20 trees to show the results they wanted. They threw out the rest.
Thats not science, thats fraud.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.