To: Second Amendment First
Sorry Joe!!! I disagree with you!!
2 posted on
11/23/2009 11:50:48 AM PST by
pollywog
("Regime Change USA".... 2010-2012 ~~Let's Roll !!)
To: Second Amendment First
I agree with Joe except the Palin running part.
3 posted on
11/23/2009 11:53:34 AM PST by
neodad
(USS Vincennes (CG 49) "Freedom's Fortress")
To: Second Amendment First
The Elites of both parties declared war on average Americans. Joe the Plumber and Sarah Palin got some heavy flak because they really are just like you and me. And the Elites hate (and fear) you and me.
4 posted on
11/23/2009 11:53:45 AM PST by
ClearCase_guy
(Play the Race Card -- lose the game.)
To: Second Amendment First
this mantra taht palin been using that she don’t need a title to effect change is empty if change don’t come. So what if we elect another RINO republican that do nothing but increase spending like before. We desperately need somoene like Palin as President who will actually start CUTTING in a big way, not on the fringes and I don’t know of anyone who have the guts to do it
6 posted on
11/23/2009 11:54:54 AM PST by
4rcane
To: Second Amendment First
I agree with Joe. As long as she is on the outside, she can fight back with no holds barred.
I’m fond of Sarah and I don’t want to tie her hands while people beat the snot out of her.
10 posted on
11/23/2009 11:57:12 AM PST by
listenhillary
(A "cult of personality" arises when a leader uses mass media creating idealized/heroic public image)
To: Second Amendment First
Is this a magazine, never heard of it, or some stinking blog?
14 posted on
11/23/2009 11:58:43 AM PST by
dalereed
To: Second Amendment First
Joe has had enough of the press and is trying to play it safe. Notice how the Republicans are trying to distance themselves for Sarah Palin? This playing it safe is how the media wins its war against us.
15 posted on
11/23/2009 11:59:00 AM PST by
jonrick46
(We're being water boarded with the sewage of Marxism.)
To: Second Amendment First
Why doesn’t he then run against that dingbat congresswoman Marcy Kaptur? Surely she could be defeated by the right candidate in the right year.
To: Second Amendment First
"I hope she doesn't (run), because I think she could do a lot for America outside of office," Wurzelbacher said. "And I think she could rally Americans to get together and make some changes from the grassroots level. I think she could be an incredible rallying point, and I think that's where she could serve America best." Not surprisingly the headline and the first couple of paragraphs try to distort the truth.
To: Second Amendment First
As far as I’m concerned Palin is the only one for 2012.
20 posted on
11/23/2009 12:04:47 PM PST by
Rappini
("Pro deo et Patria.)
To: Second Amendment First
I hope she does run but if she didn’t, she could be a powerful force campaigning for conservative candidates and could be in line for a high level appointment when a conservative politician wins the presidency.
23 posted on
11/23/2009 12:15:10 PM PST by
Graybeard58
("Get lost, Mitt. You're the Eddie Haskell of the Republican party." (Finny))
To: Second Amendment First
I think Joe's wrong about Palin being just a rallying point. Being a potential candidate makes her more of a rallying point.
But Joe's the first one in the spotlight to say he doesn't like Obama.
I think Joe gets it in that if you don't stand up against those who threaten your rights, even if it's painful, you will lose those rights.
I have respect for Joe.
To: Second Amendment First
Joe the Plumber is a RINO!!!! He must die!!!!
32 posted on
11/23/2009 4:07:43 PM PST by
r9etb
To: Second Amendment First
"Wurzelbacher told E&P he hopes she is not a candidate for president in 2012."
OFF WITH JOE THE PLUMBERS HEAD!
33 posted on
11/23/2009 4:44:22 PM PST by
Bob J
("For every 1000 hacking at the branches of evil, one strikes at its root.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson