All The News That’s Fit To Bury (NYT ignores climategate)

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/news-forum/index ^

[chessplayer]

Seeing as they each impact key pillars of what today passes for liberalism, there seems to be more than a few connections between the recent ACORN stings by Giles, O’Keefe and Breitbart, and the recent hacking of the emails of the University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit, or “Global WarmingGate”, as Charlie Martin dubs it elsewhere at Pajamas. Not the least is that they each sent the legacy media into full gatekeeper mode, hoping to prevent exciting, important news of current events from ever reaching their readers.

[chessplayer]

Media`s motto - "If we don`t report it, it never happened."

[ClearCase_guy]

Thanks for linking to Free Republic! That’s a great site!

[FormerACLUmember]

It is actually far more morally evil than that the New York Times simply would not report on the British climate data mass forgery.

The Times announced that that it would ignore the evidence since IT WAS OBTAINED "ILLEGALLY."

[RushIsMyTeddyBear]

Great. The NYT won’t report about the GW scandal.....but gladly report news that compromises our security. Typical commie trash:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/23/us/23helium.html?_r=1&hp

[Star Traveler]

You were saying ...

Not the least is that they each sent the legacy media into full gatekeeper mode, hoping to prevent exciting, important news of current events from ever reaching their readers.

Don't let the gatekeepers affect what you are able to see and know and tell others about. See the following video documentary...

---

It’s one thing to gripe and complain about these things and disagree with it, but it’s quite another to convince your friends and neighbors and relatives and coworkers...

THEREFORE..., it’s also absolutely necessary for people to know the information in the following documentary. If there were simply one video that you could see and/or show people you know... this would be the one...

---

The following is an excellent video documentary on the so-called “Global Warming” I would recommend it to all FReepers. It’s a very well-made documentary.

“The Great Global Warming Swindle”

If you want to download it, via a BitTorrent site (using a BitTorrent client), you can get it at the following link. Information about BitTorrent protocol and BitTorrent clients and their comparison at these three links (in this sentence). Some additional BitTorrent information here and here.

Download it here...
http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/3635222/The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle
[This is a high-quality copy, of about a gigabyte in size. This link is the information about it, and you have to click the download link to get it on your BitTorrent client software. You'll also find users' comments here, too.]

It’s worth seeing and having for relatives, friends, neighbors and coworkers to see.

Also, see it online here...
http://www.moviesfoundonline.com/great_global_warming_swindle.php
[this one is considerably lower quality, is a flash video and viewable online, of course..., and also, you can download flash video on a website either yourself or some software doing it.]

Buy it on DVD here...
[this would be the very highest quality version, on a DVD disk, of several gigabytes in size...] At Amazon, it seems to be high-priced now and have only a few copies right now.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000WLUXZE

At WAGtv (a UK shop), but don't know about shipping. The price is reasonable, though.
https://www.wagtv.com/product/The-Great-Global-Warming-Swindle-322.html
[And..., some information from WAGtv about this item.]

---

Also, in split parts on YouTube...

The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 1 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TqqWJugXzs

The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 2 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5rGpDMN8lw

The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 3 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzFL6Ixe_bo

The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 4 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNQy2rT_dvU

The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 5 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dzIMXGI6k8

The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 6 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GjOgQN1Jco

The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 7 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHI2GfbfrYw

The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 8 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7N9benJh3Lw

The Great Global Warming Swindle - Credits (Part 9 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_1ifP-ri58

[sam_paine]

[MHGinTN]

Here's a much more recent talk on the issues by a man who is becoming the primary voice of opposition to this scam:

Lord Christopher Monckton (95 minutes):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stij8sUybx0

There is a link to the pdf of his powerpoint visuals, too.

[PGalt]

Telling. Thanks for posting.

The truth will bury the propagandists.

[Star Traveler]

You were saying ...

Here's a much more recent talk on the issues by a man who is becoming the primary voice of opposition to this scam:

Lord Christopher Monckton (95 minutes):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stij8sUybx0

Thanks that's good to have. I'm downloading it right now. It's about a 551 MB file, and it looks like it's going to be good. I'll view it tonight.

[Paladin2]

Duplicate posting!

Original

[1776 Reborn]

Beck finally got in to this story in his last half hour of his program today. Is anyone on Fox covering this?

[Publius6961]

Thanks for linking to Free Republic! That’s a great site!

That's really strange.

There's another Free Republic?

[Publius6961]

The Times announced that that it would ignore the evidence since IT WAS OBTAINED "ILLEGALLY."

"Gobal Warming lost credibility a few years ago so it morphed into "Climate Change." Equally meaningless, but the rubes haven't figured it out.

Here, they keep calling it a "hack," which is "illegal," although, clearly, by analyzing the details, it was clearly a "whistleblower" summary of illegal acts, and clearly not only legal, but laudable. The selective nature of the huge disclosure clearly is irrefuteable.

Some careers are clearly (and justifiably) over...

[Billg64]

bump

[Publius6961]

A special "thank you" or all those links.

Unless you do this all the time, I know how much work that usually is.

[CygnusTheSwan]

The Times announced that that it would ignore the evidence since IT WAS OBTAINED "ILLEGALLY."


I haven't looked back and researched this, but I wonder how much reporting was done when Sarah Palin's email account was hacked. I suspect quite a bit...

[Publius6961]

[MHGinTN]

When I downloaded it, the file was 202 MB and the pdf powerpoint file smaller still, to view while listening to the lecture on split screen.

[steelyourfaith]

 

Beam me to Planet Gore !

[Star Traveler]

I believe it was the higher resolution version that I was downloading, which is why it was a bigger file size.