"All the news that's fit to print, but if we don't like it, we just might squint"
Posted on 11/22/2009 7:08:14 PM PST by gusopol3
This is the position of the New York Times when given the chance to publish sensitive information that might hinder the liberal agenda. Of course, when the choice is between publishing classified information that might endanger the lives of U.S. troops in the field or intelligence programs vital to national security, that information is published without hesitation by the nation's paper of record.
(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...
There is a reason only terrorists read the NYT....
did they ever talk about palin’s emails when they were hacked?
Its time, the NYT is going down. The NYT we receive here in FL is about the size of the NY Daily News opened. We can’t even get a weeks worth of use in the parrot cage.
Their reasoning is , Palin’s such a publicity hound, everything she does is intended for the public eye.
Besides, he's probably as bothered by the NYT's propaganda as you are. Parrots are, after highly intelligent and sensitive beings.
Oh yeah..you mean, like..details of the Terrorist Surveillance Program, right?
I didn't think the NYT could shock me with its bias anymore, but I have to say the boldness of this drivel does surprise me.
"All the news that's fit to print, but if we don't like it, we just might squint"
as opposed to algore and the global warming crowd???
NYTimes: We Won’t Publish “Statements that Were Never Intended for the Public Eye.”
Or report on a Democrat VP candidate’s sexcapades (Breck Boy!)
Btw, the NYT endorsed Mondale over Reagan in 1984, which kinda tells you all you need to know, ya know?
P!ss on the NYT!
Seems like a different standard than the one they apply to the GOP.
“All the News that Fits our Views.”
Obama’s thinking of subsidizing the poor witto newspapers, so they don’t have to go out of business.
C’mon, they’re just trying to be fair. Why should they be any harder on Obama than they were on Stalin 70 years ago?
What grotesque hypocrites they've proven themselves to be.
Even their liberal readers have to recognize the hypocrisy in this statement.
LOL This from those who printed classified information? What hypocracy!
Unbelievable the lies they think they can get away with.
Wonder what Clark (the Liar) Hoyt will have to say?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.