Some of the emails are just “normal scientific process”. If you have ever tried to publish a paper ...Funny, it's never occurred to me to actually remove editors at a magazine unfavorable to my position though ...
How few of those e-mails have you seen?
lol I have not read all 62 MB of them. I’m just saying that this sort of thing, at some level, goes on all the time in a number of fields.
Like choosing who gets to be on the peer review committee. When you choose, you know what they have published and what their position is. That’s a lot of power!
I have not come across the issue of removing editors, though, but I think it is fundamentally the same as stacking review committees.
From what I have seen, there is much more control exerted in the AGW field. After all, the debate is over (at least if you were the model for Love Story).