Posted on 11/20/2009 2:39:39 PM PST by Nachum
Is she wearing eyebrows or caterpillars?
Her teeth are the same shade as my tobacco chewing bother-in-law.
good god.
Soviet psychology served the state as well.
The tactic is to declare that anyone opposed to communism must be insane.
The left is a hive and the Kenyan is the current queen bee.
And I suppose, on the flip side, that she thinks Bill and Hillary, and our current president all tell the truth. Despite the fact that they have been caught in many lies over the years.
Sounds like this “expert” used the same methodology as a pet psychic.
At least in the last few years I see a tiny, tiny, bit of improvement. Some outside the junkies are noticing. But, I think the majority still think the MSM are credible and real.
Where do all these freak show people come from???
Closets?
What I find quite remarkable is the fact that alleged professionals such as DePaulo find the time, and dredge up the temerity, to attack Sarah - as though they were submitting a formal professional statement. All one actually finds in DePaulo’s rather pathetic and silly comments is that she doesn’t support her remarks about lying. I suspect that she is quite close to deserving a formal criticism from the American Psychological Association. But then, poor Bella, she is simply vituperating over the Palin Happy and Well Oriented American Family Syndrome, as opposed to Bella’s “if it doesn’t hurt, it’s OK” mewling.
Easy to see why she’s writing articles for singles columns.
Bravo. That was a brilliant diagnosis.
She can't. She's a liberal. Along with touting *global warming*, PDS is part of their *religion*.
Odd that a psychologist would not be familiar with the concept of “projection”.
Is that Pat from SNL?
Wow,that’s a wolfer for ya.
Maybe she is the one who went to Columbia with him???
Let’s ask her a straight-forward question for which likely to elicit a lying answer: “Should the democrat party stop pimping government?”
Without even seeing the pic. . . I had a pretty good idea what she looked like
Ugly, angry . .and jealous
Since she is treading perilously close to diagnosing someone she has never examined, yeah. Sorta like that book about W by the shrink.
Pointing out lies would seem to be the minimum requirement for calling someone a liar, wouldn’t it? I am the author of a book about lies/lying and I think this Professor is full of herself. Once upon a time PT was a good magazine with serious articles. That was a very long time ago. Now it is repulsive.
Calling Janet Napolitano, one of the top “20 eligible singles in washington”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.