nice paper in the files saying the researcher could not get the 8 main climate models to produce the actual sea pressure measurements which were being observed.
In recent decades winter sea level pressure has decreased over the Arctic and increased in the Northern Hemisphere subtropics, with an associated strengthening of midlatitude westerly winds1. This trend has previously been shown to be inconsistent with simulated internal climate variability and with the simulated response to greenhouse gases and sulphate aerosol changes2,3, but other climate influences have been suggested as a possible reason for the discrepancy3. Here, for the first time, we compare observed Northern Hemisphere sea level pressure trends with those simulated in response to all the major climate forcings in eight state-of-the-art coupled climate models over the past 50 years, and find that the observed trend is inconsistent both with simulated internal variability and with the simulated response to combined human and natural climate influences.
We derive an index of the zonal circulation from December-February mean NCEP reanalysis data by subtracting mean sea level pressure northward of 45°N from mean sea level pressure between the Equator and 45°N. The trend in this index over the period 1955—2005 is shown in Fig. 1. We compare the observed trend with output from eight coupled climate models prepared for the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (UKMO-HadCM3, CCSM3, PCM, GFDL-CM2.0, GFDL-CM2.1, MIROC3.2(medres), GISS-EH, and GISS-ER). In order to assess whether the observed trend could be due to internal climate variability, we calculate equivalent zonal index trends in 3853 overlapping 50-year segments from the models’ control integrations (shown by the black histogram in Fig. 1). The observed trend is greater than any 50-yr zonal index trend in any of the model control simulations, indicating that the observed trend is inconsistent with simulated internal variability at the 2% significance level.
In order to assess the possible role of external forcing in the zonal index trends, we also calculate zonal indices for the period 1945—2005 in historical simulations of the climate models which include greenhouse gas, sulphate aerosol, stratospheric ozone, volcanic aerosol, and solar irradiance changes. In cases where the historical simulations ended before February 2005, output from scenario integrations with only anthropogenic forcings was used for those years not included in the historical simulation. The resulting zonal index trends in each of the 39 ensemble members are shown by the red histogram in Fig. 1. Although the mean trend in these simulations is significantly positive (0.41 hPa / 50 yr), all the simulated trends are less than the observed trend, indicating that the simulated and observed trends are inconsistent at the 5% level.
Overall we find that the observed Northern Hemisphere circulation trend is inconsistent with simulated internal variability, and that it is also inconsistent with the simulated response to anthropogenic and natural forcing in eight coupled climate models. This is therefore an aspect of large scale climate change for which current climate models are demonstrably inconsistent with observations: If we can understand and correct this bias this will lead to improvements in predictions of future climate change.
The quote is from another thread. Now that FOX has it, maybe the spread will continue. It's made huge progress from this morning.