Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mnehring
However, there may be a way this backfires. Holder could start an investigation and subpoena the tapes, put Breitbart on a court ordered non-disclosure as this is an ongoing investigation, then stonewall until after the election, essentially hiding all the tapes.

It sounds like Brietbart is actually daring Holder to do this. Question is, why? He's done a good job so far of laying down traps and letting people walk into them, so what would be his motive for dangling the bait this time?

86 posted on 11/20/2009 8:25:06 AM PST by kevkrom (Obama's Waterloo: a "hockey mom" with a laptop and a Facebook account)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: kevkrom
so what would be his motive for dangling the bait this time? Hee hee hee!
88 posted on 11/20/2009 8:26:52 AM PST by paulycy (Demand Constitutionality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson