Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breitbart to AG Holder: Investigate ACORN or We’ll Release More Tapes Just Before 2010 Election
biggovernment.com ^

Posted on 11/20/2009 7:21:12 AM PST by Sub-Driver

Breitbart to AG Holder: Investigate ACORN or We’ll Release More Tapes Just Before 2010 Election

Posted By Publius On November 20, 2009 @ 1:36 am In ACORN | 99 Comments

Earlier tonight Andrew Breitbart, James O’Keefe and Hannah Giles discussed the final chapter of the ACORN L.A. saga [1] on “Hannity,” but more interestingly, Breitbart disclosed where the story goes from here. Transcript (below) starts from 3:50 into the clip:

Breitbart: There’s a lot of hypocrisy and the dust has settled for ACORN and at the end of the day they’ve recognized that Eric Holder, the Attorney General, has not initiated an investigation into ACORN after we now have seven tapes. There were five initially that came out, ACORN was defunded by the Senate, was defunded by the House, lost it’s link to the Census; while all that damage occurred, Congress didn’t come in to investigate them, obviously not the Attorney General’s office, and they’ve now realized let’s get back into business because they realized that the dust settled and they were not being investigated, it was Hannah, James, and me who were being investigated, that’s why we’ve been forced to offer this latest tape.

Hannity: Are you saying, Andrew, that there are more tapes?

Breitbart: Oh my goodness there are!

(Excerpt) Read more at biggovernment.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hannahgiles
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 last
To: gaijin
So think of putting them in skater or urban stuff.

Why can't they just be themselves??

101 posted on 11/20/2009 10:59:07 AM PST by Getsmart64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

There is plenty of information that’s already been released to begin an investigation and to prosecute. Holder does not need any more tapes to do that, especially if there is no evidence on the unreleased tapes that has to do with the evidence on the already released tapes.

If these tapes contain only new evidence of heretofore uncovered criminal activity, they are not relevant to an investigation of the criminal activity that has already been uncovered.

Make sense?


102 posted on 11/20/2009 11:07:35 AM PST by savedbygrace (You are only leading if someone follows. Otherwise, you just wandered off... [Smokin' Joe])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 444Flyer

Sweet~ and nice pic!!!


103 posted on 11/20/2009 12:04:21 PM PST by Freedom2specul8 (I am Jim Thompson............................Please pray for our troops....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~

Nice whiskers. (Wanted some variety in the pics.;))


104 posted on 11/20/2009 1:58:13 PM PST by 444Flyer (We will not stand down! Psalm 34:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson