To: antiRepublicrat
"The ink could also be from the earlier days after the shrouds creation, basically an ad describing the newly-forged relic." If, as many theororize, the shroud is a medieval European forgery made for a European audience, the Aramaic script would seem a little over the top, don't you think?
31 posted on
11/20/2009 6:35:43 AM PST by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: Joe 6-pack
Facts are stubborn, they have analyzed parts of the Shroud and found that there are certain plant pollen specimens on it that is exclusively located in the area of the middle east where Jesus Christ lived.
These people who poop pooo the shroud and say it's a fake are like the TV show on the Discovery channel a few years ago about where they created THE FACE of Jesus where they took a human skull and made some clay model of it and said " NOW WE HAVE THE FACE OF JESUS " ... once again, facts are stubborn, in the first place, there is no skull of Jesus to make a forensic clay model of ( maybe they were hinting also to debunk the Biblical account of his resurrection claming that he never rose again ) his face because Jesus was resurrected and is now in heaven on the throne.
65 posted on
11/20/2009 7:55:52 AM PST by
American Constitutionalist
(There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson