Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC’s Robin Roberts Grills Govt Official: Was Breast Cancer Decision Rationing?
Newsbusters ^ | 11/19/09 | Scott Whitlock

Posted on 11/20/2009 4:23:24 AM PST by Dr. Scarpetta

ABC’s Robin Roberts on Thursday pressed a government official on rationing and a new recommendation that women under the age of 50 shouldn’t get regular mammograms.

Talking to one of report's authors, she chided, "Dr. [Thomas] Wilt, you know many are feeling that this is trying to save money, that this is a political move."

Roberts challenged Wilt, who is with the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force.

Although she didn’t specifically use the word rationing, the implication was clear: "You are an independent panel, but federally funded independent panel.

How do you respond to those who feel that this is nothing more than a cost-saving measure?"

On Wednesday’s GMA, the program featured a clip of Dr. Peter Jokich, of Rush University Medical Center. Making a similar point, he derided the report: "I think it’s totally ridiculous.

I may not be politically correct, but I think this is really about money and politics. It’s about the beginning of rationing care and I don’t think it’s really about the health of individual women."

In a follow-up question on Thursday, Roberts, who is a survivor of breast cancer, pointed out the organization’s own numbers don’t seem to support the change in screening recommendation.

She explained that mammographies for women between 40 and 49 prevented one death per 1904 person and one death per 1339 for females 50 to 59.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: breastcaawareness; breastcancer; nomoreawareness; obama; obamabringsdeath; obamacare; obamadeathpanel; romney; romneybringsdeath; romneycare; romneydeathpanel; socializedmedicine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

1 posted on 11/20/2009 4:23:25 AM PST by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta
As I said yesterday, THIS is a big problem with ObamaCare.

Every decision, large and small, will now be viewed with skepticism.

"Is this for medical reasons, or economic/political ones?"

2 posted on 11/20/2009 4:26:25 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Economic.....IMO


3 posted on 11/20/2009 4:28:10 AM PST by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

Frankly this is why people should pay for their own health care. If you feel something is worth while you can do it as you desire on your dime. All the problems come about when people want to spend their neighbors dime for their health care.


4 posted on 11/20/2009 4:28:10 AM PST by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta
The point is that you now have to ask the question.

Whether your opinion is right or wrong, you now have to question your doctor, and your medical "experts".

5 posted on 11/20/2009 4:30:40 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

WHAT business does the federal gov have telling people WHEN they can have medical care.

I thought Roe was about choice and personal control of our bodies.


6 posted on 11/20/2009 4:30:42 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta
Latest Photo of Obozo care

Train Wreck

7 posted on 11/20/2009 4:31:59 AM PST by verga (I am not an apologist, I just play one on Television)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
WHAT business does the federal gov have telling people WHEN they can have medical care.

This is about recommendations, not rules.

8 posted on 11/20/2009 4:32:23 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
What nobody is taking about is that the house bill would require insurance plans to cover preventive care that received an “A” or “B” rating in the current recommendations of this very United States Preventive Services Task Force. THEY will be final arbiter...no doctors, not hospitals. How political do you think THAT would be???
9 posted on 11/20/2009 4:32:44 AM PST by machman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta
for women between 40 and 49 prevented one death per 1904 person and one death per 1339 for females 50 to 59.

U.S. population estimates:

Females 40-49 22.5 million
Females 50-59 20.0 million

10 posted on 11/20/2009 4:35:54 AM PST by NautiNurse (Obama: A day without TOTUS is like a day without sunshine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

” This is about recommendations, not rules.”

Recommendations coming out shortly before the Senate votes on BO care?

Govt panels comprised of beancounters will use these recommendations to establish care levels.


11 posted on 11/20/2009 4:37:28 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

When it’s personal then it’s a different story, eh Robin!!!

Much like Chris Wallace is outraged by the thought of rationing health care for the elderly.


12 posted on 11/20/2009 4:40:54 AM PST by Carley (OBAMA IS A MALEVOLENT FORCE IN THE WORLD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
Let's carry out the scenario...

If a woman performs a self breast exam (against new recommendations) and finds a lump, will she be denied coverage for diagnostic testing to determine pathology of the mass?

13 posted on 11/20/2009 4:41:09 AM PST by NautiNurse (Obama: A day without TOTUS is like a day without sunshine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

Thats 11,817 women between 40-49 and 14,937 women between 50-59 who will probably die under this recommendation.

So 26,754 women as a minimum.


14 posted on 11/20/2009 4:42:35 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta
She explained that mammographies for women between 40 and 49 prevented one death per 1904 person and one death per 1339 for females 50 to 59.

The uninsured cost of a mammogram is about $120. Over a period of 10 years (40-49) that's $1,200. So the cost per prevented death is a bit over $2 million, by those figures.

The government has decided that it's cheaper to let the women die.

This is going to turn out to be the biggest goof the Obama Administration has made regarding people's atitudes towards government-run healthcare.

15 posted on 11/20/2009 4:43:29 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (Public healthcare looks like it will work as well as public housing did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

“will she be denied coverage for diagnostic testing to determine pathology of the mass? “

Look to Canada and England for that answer.

Yes, but she may eventually be able to get it. In about months if she doesn’t have any other risk factors that the govt can use to delay care.


16 posted on 11/20/2009 4:43:46 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

The problem is insurance companies will take the recommendations and deny payment for the services that the “committee” says aren’t necessary. It’s a slippery slope.


17 posted on 11/20/2009 4:44:06 AM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

Sorry that should read

Yes, but she may eventually be able to get it. In about 18 months if she doesn’t have any other risk factors that the govt can use to delay care.


18 posted on 11/20/2009 4:45:16 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta
Meanwhile....

New Guidelines: No More 'Annual' Pap Smears Doctors Say Young Women Can Wait for First Pap, and Get Them Less Often

19 posted on 11/20/2009 4:45:29 AM PST by mewzilla (Voter fraud is treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: machman; Izzy Dunne
What nobody is taking about is that the house bill would require insurance plans to cover preventive care that received an “A” or “B” rating in the current recommendations of this very United States Preventive Services Task Force. THEY will be final arbiter...no doctors, not hospitals. How political do you think THAT would be???

And that recommendation has caused mammograms for women 40-49 to get a C rating. Which means it would not be covered.

20 posted on 11/20/2009 4:45:33 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (Public healthcare looks like it will work as well as public housing did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson