Why do you feel that it is necessary to give naturalistic explanations for the wondrous events described in the Bible? I’m curious why you search for naturalistic explanations for these events rather than accept them as signs from God?
Did you mean to ask me that question? My opinion is God spoke the world into existence and when he did, it left a mark. I believe all science is just the observations of the effects of what God does.
I’m not sure why you’re asking me that.
[[I’m curious why you search for naturalistic explanations for these events rather than accept them as signs from God?]]
We don’t even have to accept them as ‘miracles that canm’t be scientifically explained’ because there is actually a very large amount of scientific evidence that points to the NEED for an intelligent Designer, and points against the idea that nature did the act- infact, there is enough evidence to show that nature could not have accomplished these acts, that it’s beginnign to sink the Darwinian ship (but there are understandably holdouts that think the holes aren’t too large to sink the ship, but the evidence is showing quite the opposite unfortunately for them). We don’t simply have to close our eyes and just say ‘God did it’, We can actually show scientiifcally HOW God did it, and hsow how it’s impossible, scientifically, mathematically, biologically, for nature to accomplish the acts.
Interesting comment from someone who believes in the naturalistic explanation of evolution instead of accepting God at His word that He created life in separate creation events and not from each other.