Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lady Jag

[[I’m curious why you search for naturalistic explanations for these events rather than accept them as signs from God?]]

We don’t even have to accept them as ‘miracles that canm’t be scientifically explained’ because there is actually a very large amount of scientific evidence that points to the NEED for an intelligent Designer, and points against the idea that nature did the act- infact, there is enough evidence to show that nature could not have accomplished these acts, that it’s beginnign to sink the Darwinian ship (but there are understandably holdouts that think the holes aren’t too large to sink the ship, but the evidence is showing quite the opposite unfortunately for them). We don’t simply have to close our eyes and just say ‘God did it’, We can actually show scientiifcally HOW God did it, and hsow how it’s impossible, scientifically, mathematically, biologically, for nature to accomplish the acts.


245 posted on 11/20/2009 2:30:52 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]


To: CottShop

Does that mean you believe the earth is young?

Believing the universe is infinitely old, I’ve viewed evolution as a continuing project of God’s.


256 posted on 11/20/2009 3:19:46 PM PST by Lady Jag (Double your income. Fire the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson