No comment...........
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: Sub-Driver
In the words of VP Cheney: GFY Leahy.
To: Sub-Driver
Democrats and all Liberals are morons. Leahy is too stupid to think about getting new information. How can it be that we depend on these fools to run this country?
To: Sub-Driver
Wow, these are the people running the country. Pray.
To: Sub-Driver
But they need to interrogate the head of the NFL about head injuries. They need to interrogate Roger Clemens about steroid use. They need to interrogate every member of the Bush Administration about Valerie Plaime.
5 posted on
11/19/2009 7:56:07 AM PST by
Question Liberal Authority
(Why buy health insurance at all if you can't be turned down for any pre-existing conditions?)
To: Sub-Driver
If the U.S. captures Osama bin Laden, there's no need to interrogate him, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee said Thursday
And if Leaky Leahy is captured, all the torture known to man wouldn't make him crack. The moron doesn't know anything.
6 posted on
11/19/2009 7:56:39 AM PST by
sasquatch
To: Sub-Driver
Osama bin Laden -- we've had enough on him, we don't need to interrogate him
Really? You know who has been hiding him for the past 8 years? If so, why haven't you done anything about it?
7 posted on
11/19/2009 7:57:42 AM PST by
Question Liberal Authority
(Why buy health insurance at all if you can't be turned down for any pre-existing conditions?)
To: Sub-Driver; Free ThinkerNY; 70th Division; 2ndDivisionVet; No Surrender No Retreat; brushcop; ...
Even Hitler would have found this schmuck useless including the other useless anti-American morons like Holder, Pelosi, Boxer, et al.
Our enemies are laughing their butts off at these useless idiots who are destroying this country from within.
If we don’t vote these anti-American morons out, we’re doomed.
8 posted on
11/19/2009 7:58:51 AM PST by
ExTexasRedhead
(clean the sewer in 2010 and 2012)
To: Sub-Driver
What about interrogating him for military intelligence purposes? We have enough evidence to hang him as soon as we catch him for his crimes, but what about finding out what he has planned and what operations against us are already in motion or are triggered to happen upon his capture? But, if we use all the means to get that intelligence it would possibly screw up the chance to prosecute him because any defense attorney would argue that the military interrogation taints the criminal evidence.
9 posted on
11/19/2009 7:59:32 AM PST by
KarlInOhio
(Obamalaise - the new mood for America.)
To: Sub-Driver
we've had enough on him As if he's just a criminal suspect on the lam. Future attacks? What? Huh?
Leahy is that remarkable combination of stupid and evil.
10 posted on
11/19/2009 8:00:03 AM PST by
denydenydeny
(The Left sees taxpayers the way Dr Frankenstein saw the local cemetery; raw material for experiments)
To: Sub-Driver
And any evidence seized that would be used to prosecute Bin Laden - was it seized pursuant to a search warrant as required? Or do we need no physical evidence to convict him in a US criminal court?
11 posted on
11/19/2009 8:00:16 AM PST by
keepitreal
( Don't tread on me.)
To: Sub-Driver
“For one thing, capturing Osama bin Laden — we’ve had enough on him, we don’t need to interrogate him,” Leahy added.
And we have enough on the other guys, too...no difference.
To: Sub-Driver
“we’ve had enough on him”
Do you think he’s just OBLIVIOUS to the fact that Bin Laden might know some stuff we need to know, or he’s just playing dumb?
I’d assume he’s just a standard DUMBASS career swindler without a clue myself. Just wondered what others think.
Either dumbass, or calculating anti-US plant. Maybe shades of both.
13 posted on
11/19/2009 8:00:27 AM PST by
chuck_the_tv_out
( <<< click my name: now featuring Freeper classifieds)
To: Sub-Driver
Leaky Lehay does not need to interrogate him, but true patriotic soldiers do!
Then publicly kill the bastard.
14 posted on
11/19/2009 8:01:09 AM PST by
Kakaze
(Exterminate Islamofacism and apologize for nothing.....except not doing it sooner!)
To: Sub-Driver
Leahy needs waterboarded and interrogated.
To: Sub-Driver
Leahy (D-Vt.), , would be the dumbest senator serving, if it were not for a couple other Democrats in a dead heat with him. Remember Fred the farmer could have won his seat the last time around. He said Leahy was so dumb he didn't know how many tits were on a cow.
16 posted on
11/19/2009 8:04:35 AM PST by
org.whodat
(Vote: Chuck De Vore in 2012.)
To: Sub-Driver
Oh yeah, but we do need to interrogate Leaky Leahy, and soon.
19 posted on
11/19/2009 8:06:15 AM PST by
dforest
(Who is the real Jim Thompson? I am.)
To: Sub-Driver
Leahy’s election, alone, is reason to kick Vermont out of the Union.
To: Sub-Driver
What an idiot Leahy is. Now everybody but the Congressional Black Caucus is scared of being labeled a racist if they disagree with any decision Obama or Holder make. It appears Holder was partially right about being cowards on the issue of race ... he was just talking about Congress!
22 posted on
11/19/2009 8:07:58 AM PST by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: Sub-Driver
"If the U.S. captures Osama bin Laden, there's no need to interrogate him, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee said Thursday." But Rev. Manning's fair game, eh LeakyL?
What a disgusting POS.
23 posted on
11/19/2009 8:08:14 AM PST by
Landru
(Forget the pebble Grasshopper, just leave.)
To: Sub-Driver
If Leahy was captured, all that’s needed to break him down is to show him a picture of Cheney.
24 posted on
11/19/2009 8:09:28 AM PST by
AU72
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson