You are missing the point here. Metmom, et al, have the gift of divine revelation and are infallible in their interpretation. They KNOW the truth. If you disagree with them on even the slightest point (not to mention the major points) you are an evo-atheist or some such crypto-pagan.
In the future, I would like you to accept that without any doubt they speak the eternal truth - that when they speak or post it is God's voice you hear and God's fingers on the keyboard.
Is that anything like when the evos tell creationists how God did everything in the book of Genesis by using evolution and lots of time, and telling creationists that they're wrong if they read it differently and that they're cultists if they do?
Of course, it is, but I don't expect you to see that or acknowledge it if you do.
>>Is that anything like when the evos tell creationists how God did everything in the book of Genesis by using evolution and lots of time, and telling creationists that they’re wrong if they read it differently and that they’re cultists if they do?<<
But that isn’t what people who understand TToE say. We/they say that the idea of creation is a philosophical/theological argument and is not scientific.