The legal story of Psycho-star trying to piggy-back on Apple's computer hardware and operating system, by modifying the Mac OS X (operating system) and reselling their modified operating system. LOL...
I guess it doesn't work, legally speaking... :-)
To: Swordmaker
I know you did Groklaw’s analysis of the case, but this is a brief article of the same.
2 posted on
11/18/2009 9:22:33 AM PST by
Star Traveler
(The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1234; 50mm; 6SJ7; Abundy; Action-America; acoulterfan; Airwinger; Aliska; altair; ...
Analysis from Edible Apple on the Apple v, Psystar case PING!
Apple v. Psystar Ping!
If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.
4 posted on
11/18/2009 9:34:28 AM PST by
Swordmaker
(Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
To: Swordmaker
Psystar modified OS X on an imaging station where it then proceeded to make mass copies of an altered version of OS X.
...and then proceeded to defend their actions with copyright law. They'll wind up selling pirate DVDs and bootlegs of movies still in theatrical release.
21 posted on
11/19/2009 5:43:07 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson