“does this man have any ethics or moral conscience? He still references that worthless essay paper he wrote and with Richard Sternberg snuck in the back door at the Smithsonian related publication. Unfortunately for Meyers, the journals’s editors actually had it peer-reviewed and the verdict came back -that Meyers’ essay had no scientific merit and duly retracted Meyer’s essay from publication. You can no longer find it in publication, only on the Dishonesty Institute’s web site where Meyers flaunts it as his “peer reviewed” publication. Sad indeed, that his book relies on this type of gibberish. “
Peer review. Operative item there, I would think. As if a review group composed of pro-evo theologians would approve of a dissenting voice.
How does it feel to be a nose picking liar?
What is it about the truth that makes you pick your nose and post your snot here?