Peer review. Operative item there, I would think. As if a review group composed of pro-evo theologians would approve of a dissenting voice.
Exactly. Liberals continue to elicit peer review arguments as if they offer some kind of remote validity.
I’ve asked the liberals on FR if a peer review of an article were done without the name attached to the work, how is it the “peers” would know if the scientist was creationist or evolutionist?
crickets.