The only time we take Time seriously is when a FReeper does the cover for them!!
Posted on 11/16/2009 10:26:13 PM PST by anymouse
- Names Ares "Invention of the Year" Based on Launch of Dummy Vehicle
Citing Time magazine's selection of NASA's proposed Ares rockets "The Best Invention of the Year" based on a single purported "test flight" of the vehicle on October 28th, the Space Frontier Foundation congratulated NASA on its propaganda triumph. The Foundation pointed out that the rocket launched by NASA was not an Ares 1 at all, but a dummy vehicle cobbled together from pieces of other space systems, an elaborate mock-up shaped and painted to look like the actual vehicle, which isn't even scheduled to fly for another 6 years.
"While many reporters know that Ares 1 is far behind schedule and likely to be canceled as an unnecessary and expensive distraction from real exploration missions, apparently Time magazine fell for this publicity hoax. There was no boy in the balloon and there most definitely was no Ares rocket launched in Florida last month," said the Foundation's Rick Tumlinson. "If anyone at Time had bothered to go beyond the NASA and contractor flacks, they would have found out what most people in the space community already knew. This was a marketing ploy designed to save a program threatened with imminent cancellation."
Time's assertion that the Ares 1 rocket is "The best and smartest and coolest thing built in 2009" is a simple error of fact and should be immediately retracted. There was no Ares 1 vehicle built in 2009.
"Even if a real Ares 1 launch vehicle were ever built and launched, it would still be an obscenely wasteful duplication of existing commercial and military rockets, which doesn't seem too smart or cool during our federal budget meltdown," Tumlinson added.
Writing last week in the Huffington Post, Apollo Moonwalker Buzz Aldrin put into words what is common knowledge in the space launch community:
"Turns out the solid booster was - literally - bought from the Space Shuttle program, since a five-segment booster being designed for Ares wasn't ready. So they put a fake can on top of the four-segmented motor to look like the real thing. Since the real Ares' upper stage rocket engine, called the J-2X wasn't ready either, they mounted a fake upper stage. No Orion capsule was ready, so - you guessed it - they mounted a fake capsule with a real-looking but fake escape rocket that wouldn't have worked if the booster had failed. Since the guidance system for Ares wasn't ready either they went and bought a unit from the Atlas rocket program and used it instead. Oh yes, the parachutes to recover the booster were the real thing -- and one of the three failed, causing the booster to slam into the ocean too fast and banging the thing up. So, why you might ask, if the whole machine was a bit of slight-of-hand rocketry did NASA bother to spend almost half a billion dollars (that's billion with a "b") in developing and launching the Ares 1-X? The answer: politics."
The Space Frontier Foundation urges everyone who thinks that accuracy in the media is important to point their browser at Time Magazine's The Best Invention of the Year: NASA's Ares Rockets [ http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1934027_1934003_1933945,00.html ], drag that red slider all the way to the left, where it says "not important" and hit the submit button. After you've done that, ask your friends to do the same.
Let's show the media that truth matters and that news should be based on objective reality rather than politics and PR.
TIME MAGAZINE: The Best Invention of the Year: NASA's Ares Rockets
Space hoax ping. ;)
I’ll read about it in four years at the dentist’s office.
Maybe the AP could loan them some “Fact Checkers”
I think that CNN’s fact checking crew is “between assignments”, since the SNL episode...
Perhaps they could be hired.
Isn’t Time the new MAD magazine now? Who takes this joke wrapper seriously anyway?
Wasnt Time put together with leftover parts?
Time Magazine has been reduced to the size of a pamphlet.
before i would accept rick’s assertions,carte blanche, i would have to understand what the space frontier foundation gets from trashing the test flight. their motivation is suspect.
“I’ll read about it in four years at the dentist’s office.”
and catch a deathly disease from the last readers hands.
The only time we take Time seriously is when a FReeper does the cover for them!!
The purpose of the human on board would be for drama, getting into the news to further funding.
Time propaganda writing is worse than ever. To them the customer is always wrong.
>>>before i would accept rick’s assertions,carte blanche, i would have to understand what the space frontier foundation gets from trashing the test flight. their motivation is suspect.
Agreed. Time may have missed it but when we had the launch I recall it specified the upper stages were dummies. No secret then and no news bulletin now.
This feels too much like the people who trashed the ABM tests when a beacon had been situated on the target. They always failed to mention the beacon simulated the guidance from the Battle Management Radar that was still under construction on the Gulf Coast for later transport around the world, and that the tests in question were not graded on hits, but were engineering tests of staging and systems.
As for “politics”, didn’t some similarly situated wise man once say “No bucks, no Buck Rogers”.
Not true - they are merely re-assigned temporarily to run goofy polls about PALIN.
The narrative was correct, only the facts were wrong.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.