What repeatable, testable experiment would that be, Ira?
==It seems that you failed to notice this little example of quote mining
What quote mining would that be, Ira? The authors admit that neutral evolution falls outside of Darwinian selection, therefore there is absolutely nothing to guide it other than completely random mutations. It's the equivalent of saying that inanimate matter came together to create the first reproducing protocell. Such a process is equally outside the descriptions of Darwinian evolution (as you are so fond of reminding us).
Posting the ID cartoon again!
This one:
"What quote mining would that be, Ira?"
Lets take a look at the original text in the correct context,
Neutral evolution falls outside the descriptions of Charles Darwin. But once the pieces gather, mutation and natural selection can take care of the rest, ultimately resulting in the now-complex form of TIM23.
it would be the part that is in bold underlined text